Comparison of complete and incomplete revascularization in CABG-patients with severely impaired left ventricular

U Boeken1, P Feindt, J Litmathe

  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Zeitschrift Fur Kardiologie
|March 17, 2004
PubMed

Insights

Complete revascularization in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improves outcomes. Accepting longer ischemia times for complete revascularization is beneficial for these high-risk patients.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiac Surgery

Background:

  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 30%) presents unique challenges.
  • The optimal revascularization strategy, complete (CR) versus incomplete (ICR), remains unclear, balancing potential benefits of reduced ischemia against comprehensive myocardial reperfusion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of complete revascularization versus incomplete revascularization on outcomes in patients with severely depressed LVEF undergoing CABG.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 263 patients with LVEF < 30% who underwent CABG between 1996 and 2000.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n=158) received CR, and Group B (n=105) received ICR due to inability to complete all intended grafts.

Main Results:

  • Group A (CR) received more grafts per patient (3.59 vs. 2.92, p<0.05) and required less intraoperative catecholamine support (33% vs. 48%, p<0.05).
  • Group B (ICR) experienced longer mechanical ventilation (20 vs. 12.1 h, p<0.05) and ICU stays (4.2 vs. 3.0 days, p<0.05), with a higher in-hospital mortality rate (6% vs. 3.2%, p<0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Complete revascularization in patients with severely depressed LVEF undergoing CABG is associated with improved clinical outcomes.
  • Accepting a potentially longer intraoperative ischemia time and cardiopulmonary bypass duration is justified to achieve effective revascularization in this patient cohort.
Abstract