Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Right Ventricle Using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Misdiagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy
Chandra Bomma1, Julie Rutberg, Harikrishna Tandri
1Department of Cardiology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Insights
Many arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) diagnoses are inaccurate. Over-reliance on MRI findings and incomplete testing lead to misdiagnosis, highlighting the need for comprehensive evaluation using established criteria.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Diagnostics
- Genetics
Background:
- Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) diagnosis significantly impacts patient and family management.
- Current diagnosis relies on International Task Force criteria.
- This study re-evaluates patients previously diagnosed with ARVD/C.
Observation:
- 89 patients diagnosed with ARVD/C underwent re-evaluation.
- Many patients had prior MRI findings suggestive of ARVD/C, particularly intramyocardial fat/wall thinning.
- These qualitative MRI findings were often not confirmed upon re-evaluation.
Findings:
- Only 27% of re-evaluated patients met the established Task Force criteria for ARVD/C.
- 46 patients with qualitative MRI abnormalities were ultimately not diagnosed with ARVD/C.
- A high frequency of ARVD/C misdiagnosis was observed.
Implications:
- Over-reliance on qualitative MRI features contributes to ARVD/C misdiagnosis.
- Incomplete diagnostic testing and lack of awareness of Task Force criteria are significant issues.
- Accurate ARVD/C diagnosis requires comprehensive evaluation beyond solely qualitative MRI findings.
Introduction:
Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) has major implications for the management of patients and their first-degree relatives. Diagnosis is based on a set of criteria proposed by the International Task Force for Cardiomyopathies. We report our experience in providing a re-evaluation for patients who previously have been diagnosed with ARVD/C.
Methods And Results:
We studied 89 patients who requested a re-evaluation for diagnosis of ARVD/C at our center. Each of these patients had been diagnosed with ARVD/C at their initial evaluation. Each patient was re-evaluated with clinical history, physical examination, and noninvasive testing at our center. Invasive testing, which included electrophysiologic testing, right ventricular angiography, and endomyocardial biopsy, was performed when clinically indicated. Sixty (92%) of the 65 patients who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at an outside institution were reported to have an abnormal MRI consistent with ARVD/C. Among these patients, the only abnormality identified was the qualitative finding of intramyocardial fat/wall thinning in 46 patients. On re-evaluation, these qualitative findings were not confirmed. None of these 46 patients ultimately were diagnosed with ARVD/C. Among the entire patient group, only 24 (27%) of the 89 patients met the Task Force criteria for ARVD/C.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that the high frequency of "misdiagnosis" of ARVD/C is due to over-reliance on the presence of intramyocardial fat/wall thinning on MRI, incomplete diagnostic testing, and lack of awareness of the Task Force criteria. Diagnosis of ARVD/C cannot rely solely upon qualitative features on MRI.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...

