Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Judgement post-stratification with imprecise rankings.

Steven N MacEachern1, Elizabeth A Stasny, Douglas A Wolfe

  • 1Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1247, USA. snm@stat.ohio-state.edu

Biometrics
|March 23, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robust Distribution-Free Tests for the Linear Model.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Bayesian Model Calibration and Sensitivity Analysis for Oscillating Biological Experiments.

Technometrics : a journal of statistics for the physical, chemical, and engineering sciences·2025
Same author

Modified check loss for efficient estimation via model selection in quantile regression.

Journal of applied statistics·2022
Same author

A class of generalized linear mixed models adjusted for marginal interpretability.

Statistics in medicine·2020
Same author

A framework for studying risk factors for lower extremity musculoskeletal discomfort in nurses.

Ergonomics·2020
Same author

Bayesian nonparametric models for ranked set sampling.

Lifetime data analysis·2014
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces probabilistic ranking to improve judgement post-stratification, a method similar to ranked set sampling. This technique enhances estimation accuracy, especially when direct ranking is challenging, and aids in handling multiple rankers.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Survey Methodology
  • Sampling Techniques

Background:

  • Judgement post-stratification, akin to ranked set sampling, requires accurate ranking of units.
  • Practical application faces challenges in precise rank assignment by human rankers.
  • Existing methods may not fully leverage probabilistic information for ranking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a probabilistic ranking method for judgement post-stratification.
  • To enhance the utility and estimation accuracy of judgement post-stratification sampling plans.
  • To provide a framework for estimation with multiple rankers in this context.

Main Methods:

  • Borrowing techniques from finite population sampling literature.
  • Developing a probabilistic approach to rank units within a set.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying the method to real-world datasets, including allometric and educational studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Probabilistic ranking facilitates the application of judgement post-stratification.
    • The proposed methods improve estimation compared to traditional approaches.
    • The technique effectively accommodates multiple rankers for enhanced data analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Probabilistic ranking is a valuable extension for judgement post-stratification.
    • This approach overcomes practical ranking difficulties and improves statistical estimation.
    • The methods are broadly applicable, demonstrated by diverse case studies.