Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Visualizing Cellular Gibberellin Levels Using the nlsGPS1 Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Biosensor
Published on: January 12, 2019
Gibberellin structure and function: biological activity and competitive inhibition of gibberellin 2- and 3-oxidases
Rod W. King1, Olavi Junttila, Lewis N. Mander
1CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Abstract:
Some gibberellin (GA) analogues, especially with C-16,17 modifications of GA(5), can inhibit growth of plants apparently by acting as competitors with the endogenous substrate of GA biosynthetic enzymes. Here, we directly confirm the competitive action of GA derivatives but also show that some analogues may retain significant bioactivity. A recombinant 3-oxidase from pea, which converts GA(20) to bioactive GA(1), was inhibited by GA(5), and 16,17-dihydro-GA(5) derivatives, especially if the C-17 alkyl chain length was increased by up to three carbons or if the C-13 hydroxyl was acetylated. Genetic confirmation that GA(5) analogues target 3-oxidases in vivo was provided by comparing the growth response of a WT (LE) pea with a 3-oxidase mutant (le-1). Two pea 2-oxidases that inactivate bioactive GAs, were inhibited by GA(1) and GA(3) but were generally insensitive to GA(5) analogues. alpha-Amylase production by barley half-seeds in response to GA analogues provided a method to study their action when effects on GA biosynthesis were excluded. This bioactivity assay showed that 16,17-dihydro GA(5) analogues have some inherent activity but mostly less than for GA(5) (5-50-fold), which in turn was 100-fold less active than GA(1) and GA(3). However, although C-17 alkyl derivatives with one or two added carbons showed little bioactivity and were purely 3-oxidase inhibitors, adding a third carbon (the 17-n-propyl-16,17-dihydro GA(5) analogue) restored bioactivity to that of GA(5). Furthermore, this analogue has lost its capacity to inhibit stem elongation of Lolium temulentum (Mander et al., Phytochemistry 49:1509-1515, 1998a), although it strongly inhibits the 3-oxidase. Thus, the effectiveness of a GA derivative as a growth retardant will reflect the balance between its bioactivity and its capacity to inhibit the terminal enzyme of GA biosynthesis. The weaker growth inhibition in dicots including pea (approximately 10%) than in monocots such as L. temulentum (>35%) is suggestive of taxonomic differences in the bioactivity of GAs and/or their effects on GA biosynthesis.
Related Concept Videos
Cell Signaling in Plants
GPCRs Regulate Adenylyl Cylase Activity
Two...
Antifungal Agents
Allosteric Regulation
Activation and Inactivation of G Proteins
Eukaryotic Transcription Inhibitors
Eukaryotic transcription inhibitors usually contain two distinct domains, a DNA...

