Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Experience and inference: how far will science carry us?

Joseph Lichtenberg1

  • 1JoeLichtenberg@aol.com

The Journal of Analytical Psychology
|March 23, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Understanding child development requires acknowledging individual experiences and inferences. Science offers insights, but context and cultural archetypes shape unique human development.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The (and this) analyst's intentions.

Psychoanalytic reviewยท2008
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Psychoanalysis

Background:

  • Scientific research has significantly advanced the understanding of infant and child development.
  • However, scientific perspectives often overlook the multi-dimensional, context-based individuality of humans within their intersubjective realms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the limitations of scientific contributions to understanding human individuality.
  • To explore the influence of variable experiences and inferences on contemporary views of development.
  • To illustrate the role of symbolization and cultural archetypes in inference through a clinical example.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing research on infant and child development.
  • Analysis of the limitations of scientific approaches in capturing individual context.
  • Exploration of the cognitive and cultural processes underlying inference.

Main Results:

  • Scientific understanding of development is valuable but incomplete.
  • Individual development is profoundly shaped by the variability of experiences and subsequent inferences.
  • Inferences are influenced by symbolization and culturally derived archetypes.

Conclusions:

  • A comprehensive view of human development necessitates integrating scientific findings with an appreciation for individual experiences and cultural contexts.
  • Symbolization and cultural archetypes play a crucial role in how individuals interpret their experiences.
  • Clinical examples highlight the complex interplay between experience, inference, and development.

Related Experiment Videos