Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microcoblation: nonablative skin rejuvenation.

Manoj T Abraham1, Gregory S Keller, Gayla Pinkosky

  • 1Vasser Hospital, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601, USA. manoj_abraham@hotmail.com

Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS
|March 23, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biologic Improvement of Skin: Pathways and Activation of Stem Cells, Growth Factors, and Peptides.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Bioelectric Modulation as a Systems-Level Adjunct to Regenerative Therapies in Facial Plastic Surgery and Hair Restoration.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Healing from Within: Biologics in Facial Plastic Surgery.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Early Imaging Biomarkers of Cartilage Strain After ACL Reconstruction Predict Patient Pain and Altered Knee Loading.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

<i>Response to Letter:</i> "The Great Tranexamic Acid Debate, In Reply to: Tranexamic Acid in Rhytidectomy: A Split-Face Multi-Institutional Study".

Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine·2026
Same author

Evolution of Facial Plastic Surgery Global Surgery Outreach in the Context of International Conflict and the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine·2026

Microcoblation uses controlled plasma energy for skin rejuvenation, offering minimal downtime and side effects. Patient satisfaction is high, rivaling traditional microdermabrasion for superficial skin treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Aesthetic Medicine
  • Plasma Physics in Medicine

Background:

  • Aging skin presents aesthetic concerns, driving demand for effective rejuvenation treatments.
  • Microdermabrasion is a conventional superficial skin rejuvenation method.
  • Non-ablative treatments are sought for reduced recovery time and side effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and describe microcoblation as a novel skin rejuvenation technique.
  • To evaluate the histological effects and clinical outcomes of microcoblation.
  • To compare patient satisfaction with microcoblation versus microdermabrasion.

Main Methods:

  • Application of a controlled high-energy plasma field to intact aging skin.
  • Observation of histological changes in the epidermis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of recovery time and side effects.
  • Comparison of patient satisfaction with microcoblation and microdermabrasion.

    • Main Results:

    • Microcoblation is a nonablative treatment.
    • It induces predictable, reversible histological changes in the epidermis.
    • Minimal recovery time and few side effects were observed.
    • Patient satisfaction with microcoblation was highly favorable compared to microdermabrasion.

    Conclusions:

    • Microcoblation is an effective nonablative treatment for skin rejuvenation.
    • The procedure offers a favorable safety profile with minimal downtime.
    • It presents a promising alternative to traditional superficial skin rejuvenation methods like microdermabrasion.