Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Spectrophotometric Screening for Potential Inhibitors of Cytosolic Glutathione S-Transferases
Published on: October 10, 2020
Subunit interface residues of glutathione S-transferase A1-1 that are important in the monomer-dimer equilibrium
Melissa A Vargo1, Lucia Nguyen, Roberta F Colman
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA.
Abstract:
Alpha class glutathione S-transferase, isozyme A1-1, is a dimer (51 kDa) of identical subunits. Using the crystal structure, two main areas of subunit interaction were chosen for study: (1) the hydrophobic ball and socket comprised of Phe52 from one subunit fitting into a socket formed on the other subunit by Met94, Phe136, and Val139 and (2) the Arg/Glu region consisting of Arg69 and Glu97 from both subunits. We introduced substitutions of these residues, by site-directed mutagenesis, to evaluate the importance of each at the subunit interface and to determine if monomeric enzymes could be generated using single mutations. Mutating each residue of the socket region to alanine results in little change in the kinetic parameters, and all are dimeric enzymes. In contrast, when Phe52, the ball residue, is replaced with alanine, the enzyme has very low activity and a weight average molecular mass of 31.9 kDa, as determined by sedimentation equilibrium experiments. Substitutions for Glu97 which eliminate the charge cause no appreciable changes in the kinetic parameters or molecular mass. Eliminating the charge on Arg69 (as in R69Q) results in a dimeric enzyme; however, when the charge is reversed (as in R69E), the weight average molecular mass is greatly shifted toward that of the monomer (33 kDa) and the changes in kinetic parameters are reasonably small. We determined the molecular masses in the presence of glutathione for F52A and R69E to ascertain whether the monomeric species retains activity. For R69E, it appears that the monomer is active, albeit less so than the dimer, while for F52A, the monomer and dimer both appear to exhibit very low activity. The dimeric species is needed to obtain high specific activity. We conclude that, of the residues that were studied, Phe52 and Arg69 are the major determinants of dimer formation and a single mutation at either position substantially hinders dimerization. The use of a mutant glutathione S-transferase which retains activity yet has a greatly weakened tendency to dimerize (such as R69E) may be advantageous for certain applications of GST fusion proteins.
Related Concept Videos
Phase II Reactions: Glutathione Conjugation and Mercapturic Acid Formation
Several distinctive characteristics distinguish glutathione conjugation from other phase II...
Protein Modifications in the RER
Broadly, these modifications can be categorized into four main categories — glycosylation, formation of disulfide bonds, assembly of protein subunits, and specific proteolytic cleavages like removal of signal sequences.
Structure and Nomenclature of Thiols and Sulfides
Phase II Reactions: Glucuronidation
Preparation and Reactions of Thiols
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...

