Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Haptic face recognition and prosopagnosia.

Andrea R Kilgour1, Beatrice de Gelder, Susan J Lederman

  • 1Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3N4. akilgour@exchange.hsc.mb.ca

Neuropsychologia
|March 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distinct information flows for different whole-body actions across LOTC subdivisions.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Neural encoding of biomechanically (im)possible human movements in occipitotemporal cortex.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Theta activity discriminates high-level, species-specific body processes.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Behavioral and neural evidence for perceptual predictions in social interactions.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

The power of tears: Observers' brain responses show that tears provide unambiguous signals independent of scene context.

Neuroimage. Reports·2025
Same author

Dissociable neural networks for processing fearful bodily expressions at different spatial frequencies.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From past recall to future projection: What does verb tense production reveal about mental time travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

Individuals with prosopagnosia, a face recognition deficit, show impaired haptic face recognition. This suggests face processing issues extend beyond vision, impacting tactile perception and configural processing across senses.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Face recognition is traditionally studied within the visual domain.
  • Prosopagnosia, or face blindness, is characterized by impaired visual face recognition, often linked to configural processing deficits.
  • Cross-modal influences on perception are increasingly recognized in psychological science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if face recognition deficits in prosopagnosia are exclusive to visual input.
  • To examine haptic face processing in an individual with prosopagnosia using a tactile inversion paradigm.
  • To determine if configural processing deficits extend to non-visual modalities.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a haptic equivalent of the visual-inversion paradigm to assess tactile face recognition.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tested a participant diagnosed with prosopagnosia on their ability to recognize faces by touch.
  • Compared haptic performance of the prosopagnosic individual with that of normal controls.

    • Main Results:

    • The prosopagnosic individual demonstrated significant difficulty in haptic face recognition.
    • Abnormal inversion effects were observed in both visual and haptic face processing by the participant.
    • Performance patterns in the haptic domain mirrored those in the visual domain for the prosopagnosic individual.

    Conclusions:

    • Face processing deficits are not confined to the visual modality and can manifest in tactile perception.
    • Configural processing, crucial for face recognition, appears to be affected across different sensory inputs.
    • Findings extend the understanding of prosopagnosia and configural processing to haptic face and object recognition.