Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (Cf-PWV) to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Should pulse pressure become part of the Framingham risk score?
T S Nawrot1, J A Staessen, L Thijs
1Studiecoördinatiecentrum, Laboratorium hypertensie, Departement Moleculair en Cardiovasculair Onderzoek, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. tim.nawrot@med.kuleuven.ac.be
Insights
Increased pulse pressure, a sign of aortic stiffening, independently predicts cardiovascular events in older adults. This finding suggests pulse pressure can enhance cardiovascular risk prediction models, offering a more sensitive measure than traditional blood pressure indices.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Gerontology
- Public Health
Background:
- Increased pulse pressure is linked to aortic stiffening and may be a sensitive cardiovascular risk indicator in older populations.
- Traditional blood pressure indices may not fully capture cardiovascular risk in middle-aged and older individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between pulse pressure and cardiovascular event risk in the general population.
- To determine if pulse pressure can improve the accuracy of the Framingham cardiovascular risk prediction model.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study of 769 men and women over 50 years old, followed for a median of 7.2 years.
- Sex-specific Framingham cardiovascular risk scores were calculated, incorporating age, blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking, and diabetes.
- Pulse pressure scores were developed using percentile cutoffs, and Cox regression analysis was used to assess hazard rates.
Main Results:
- A 10 mmHg increase in pulse pressure was associated with a 31% higher risk of cardiovascular events after adjusting for traditional risk factors.
- Both blood pressure and pulse pressure scores independently predicted cardiovascular events, with pulse pressure showing a hazard rate of 1.37.
- When both scores were included in a Cox model, only the pulse pressure score remained statistically significant, indicating its independent predictive value.
Conclusions:
- Pulse pressure is a significant independent predictor of cardiovascular events in middle-aged and older individuals.
- Incorporating pulse pressure into risk assessment may enhance the predictive accuracy of existing cardiovascular risk models like the Framingham score.
- Further research, particularly within the Framingham cohort, is recommended to validate these findings.
Abstract:
An increased pulse pressure suggests aortic stiffening. New evidence also suggests that pulse pressure is a more sensitive measure of risk than other indexes of blood pressure in middle-aged and older persons. The objective of the study was to relate pulse pressure to the risk of cardiovascular events in the general population, and to assess whether pulse pressure could improve the Framingham risk prediction. A total of 378 men and 391 women over the age of 50 years (mean 62.7 years) were followed. Sex-specific Framingham cardiovascular risk scores were derived from age, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, total and HDL cholesterol, smoking status and the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. The cutoff points used to develop a pulse pressure score were calculated by determining the percentile points corresponding to the blood pressure categories in the Framingham risk score. We calculated relative hazard rates by multiple Cox regression. After a median follow-up of 7.2 years (range: 11 months-15 years), a total of 148 cardiovascular events occurred. In Cox regression analysis, a 10 mmHg higher pulse pressure was associated with 31% (P<0.0001) increase in the risk for cardiovascular events (fatal and nonfatal) after adjustment for sex, age, total and HDL cholesterol, smoking and the presence of diabetes mellitus. After adjustment for the aforementioned risk factors, a one-point increment in the blood pressure and pulse pressure scores was associated with a 40 and 48% (both P<0.0001) increase in the risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, respectively. When both the blood pressure and pulse pressure scores were forced into a Cox model, only the pulse pressure score remained statistically significant (P<0.0001) with a relative hazard rate of 1.37 (CI: 1.16-1.69). These prospective data suggest that pulse pressure may improve the Framingham risk prediction among middle-aged and older individuals. Further studies, especially in the Framingham cohort, are warranted.
More Related Videos
07:51Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
06:04Pulse-Wave Velocity, Flow-Mediated Dilation, and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness to Assess Cardiovascular Risk in Population with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pulse
Pulse Rate and its Significance
Pulse rate, often measured in beats per minute (bpm), reflects the heart rate (HR), which is influenced by numerous factors such as stress, physical activity, and hormonal changes. A normal resting adult pulse rate falls between...
Pulse amplitude and quality
A weak or absent pulse may indicate reduced cardiac output or poor left ventricular contraction, which can be signs of cardiovascular dysfunction or...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical indicator...