Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality and disease management.

Al Lewis1

  • 1Disease Management Purchasing Consortium, Wellesley, Massachusetts 02481, USA. DiseasMgmt@aol.com

Managed Care Interface
|March 25, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do Diabetes Wellness Programs Work? Wellness Programs Will Not and Cannot Prevent Diabetes.

Managed care (Langhorne, Pa.)·2016
Same author

On warpath against wellness. Authors say companies should focus on outliers. Interview by Merrill Goozner.

Modern healthcare·2013
Same author

Too much health care can be hazardous to your health.

Managed care (Langhorne, Pa.)·2013
Same author

Wellness programs and cost reductions.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2013
Same author

Questioning the widely publicized savings reported for North Carolina Medicaid.

The American journal of managed care·2012
Same author

Case studies that flunk every plausibility test known to mankind.

Managed care (Langhorne, Pa.)·2012
Same journal

Changes in hospital readmissions for diabetes-related conditions. Differences by payer.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

Heart disease and managed care.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

A conversation with James K. Min, MD.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

Acute coronary syndromes.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

Improving outcomes in cardiovascular disease.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

The effect for oncology of the national coverage determination for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Managed care interface·2008
See all related articles

Vendor contracts should focus on objective quality measures, not just incentives. Choosing a vendor confident in their outcomes and willing to undergo rigorous assessment is key to ensuring quality partnerships.

Area of Science:

  • Contract Management
  • Vendor Quality Assurance
  • Procurement Strategies

Background:

  • Vendor selection and contract negotiation are critical for ensuring service quality.
  • Incentive-based contracts are commonly used to motivate vendor performance.
  • Assessing vendor commitment to quality is a complex challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of quality targets in contractual agreements.
  • To determine if contractual incentives adequately ensure vendor quality.
  • To identify characteristics of vendors that indicate a strong commitment to quality.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of contractual clauses related to quality targets and incentives.
  • Review of vendor performance data in relation to contractual obligations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case study analysis of vendor selection and contract negotiation outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Contractual quality targets alone do not guarantee vendor accountability.
    • The need for incentives may indicate underlying issues with vendor selection or contract terms.
    • Vendors demonstrating confidence through objective performance measures are preferable partners.

    Conclusions:

    • Focusing on objective, measurable outcomes is more effective than relying solely on incentives.
    • Vendor confidence in their own quality is a strong indicator of a reliable partnership.
    • Thorough vendor vetting and contract negotiation are essential for quality assurance.