Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Rate versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation
Korin K Anthony1, Vincent F Mauro
1University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA. korinrph@hotmail.com
Insights
Rate control is a viable initial treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), showing no inferiority to rhythm control regarding mortality. This approach also reduces hospitalizations and adverse effects, making it a reasonable first-line strategy, particularly for elderly patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) management strategies include rate and rhythm control.
- Recent trials have compared the efficacy and safety of these two approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if rate control is a viable initial treatment for persistent AF.
- To compare rate control versus rhythm control in managing AF based on recent trial data.
Main Methods:
- Biomedical literature search of MEDLINE and the Iowa database (1966-2003).
- Inclusion of relevant articles identified from the literature search.
- Review and synthesis of data from selected studies.
Main Results:
- Rate control demonstrated non-inferiority to rhythm control concerning mortality in persistent AF.
- Rate control was associated with reduced hospitalizations and fewer proarrhythmic events.
- No significant differences were found between rate and rhythm control for thromboembolism and stroke incidence.
Conclusions:
- Rate control is a reasonable first-line strategy for persistent AF, especially in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic elderly patients.
- Rhythm control is linked to higher hospitalization rates and antiarrhythmic drug adverse effects.
- Further research is necessary to define the role of rate control in younger AF patients.
Objective:
To determine whether rate control is a viable initial treatment approach in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) through the evaluation of recently completed trials comparing rate and rhythm control.
Data Sources:
Biomedical literature was obtained through MEDLINE (1966-December 2003) and the Iowa database.
Study Selection And Data Extraction:
Articles identified from the biomedical literature search were reviewed and included if deemed relevant.
Data Synthesis:
Currently available data suggest that rate control is not inferior to rhythm control in patients with persistent AF with respect to mortality. Rate control also reduces hospitalizations and the occurrence of proarrhythmias. No significant difference was observed between treatments with respect to thromboembolism and strokes.
Conclusions:
Due to the increased incidence of hospitalizations and antiarrhythmic adverse effects associated with rhythm control, rate control is a reasonable first-line strategy in the treatment of recurrent AF, especially in elderly patients who are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. Further studies are needed to clearly define the role of rate control in younger patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Dysrhythmias III: Characteristics of Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias

