Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bite marks--the criminal's calling cards.

D K Whittaker1

  • 1University of Wales College of Medicine, Forensic Dentistry, 4th Floor, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK.

British Dental Journal
|March 25, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Human teeth are primarily for cutting and grinding prepared food, unlike carnivorous animals that use canines for killing and tearing prey. Some individuals exhibit primitive behaviors, using their teeth for biting.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The surgical senior lecturer.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2009
Same author

Difficulties in estimating age using root dentine translucency in human teeth of varying antiquity.

Archives of oral biology·1999
Same author

The effects of dental wear on third molar eruption and on the curve of Spee in human archaeological dentitions.

Archives of oral biology·1999
Same author

Calculus deposits and bone loss on the teeth of Romano-British and eighteenth-century Londoners.

Archives of oral biology·1999
Same author

A comparison of the ability of experts and non-experts to differentiate between adult and child human bite marks using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Forensic science international·1998
Same author

Orthodontic reconstruction in a victim of murder.

British journal of orthodontics·1998

Area of Science:

  • Comparative anatomy
  • Paleoanthropology
  • Forensic dentistry

Background:

  • Carnivorous animals possess specialized dentition for predation, utilizing canines for killing and flesh-tearing.
  • Human dentition is adapted for processing food, primarily for cutting and grinding.
  • Bite marks are a form of physical evidence in forensic investigations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the functional morphology of human and carnivorous dentition.
  • To explore the potential for human teeth to be used in aggressive behaviors.
  • To highlight the significance of canine and incisor morphology in both predation and biting.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of dental structures in canids and felids versus hominids.
  • Review of functional adaptations of teeth in feeding behaviors.
  • Examination of case studies involving human bite marks.

Main Results:

  • Carnivores employ canines for prey capture and initial processing, while humans primarily use incisors and molars for mastication.
  • Human incisors and canines, though less specialized than in carnivores, can inflict significant damage.
  • Bite mark analysis in forensic science relies on the unique characteristics of human dental features.

Conclusions:

  • Human dentition exhibits a functional divergence from predatory carnivores, adapted for processed food.
  • The capacity for using teeth as weapons persists in humans, reflecting a potential reversion to primitive functions.
  • Understanding dental morphology is crucial for both evolutionary biology and forensic science.

Related Experiment Videos