Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Cyclosporine in pediatric kidney transplantation
L Pape1, J H H Ehrich, G Offner
1Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical School of Hannover, Hannover, Germany. larspape@t-online.de
Insights
Cyclosporine (CsA) significantly improved pediatric kidney transplant outcomes, reducing rejection and enhancing graft survival. CsA-based immunosuppression also improved child growth rates compared to older methods.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Transplantation Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Pre-cyclosporine (CsA) era immunosuppression (azathioprine, steroids) led to high rejection rates and growth retardation in pediatric renal transplant recipients.
- Early 1980s: Introduction of CsA for pediatric immunosuppression necessitated specialized dosing and monitoring due to metabolic differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of cyclosporine (CsA) on pediatric renal transplant outcomes, including rejection rates, graft survival, and growth.
- To review the evolution of CsA formulations and monitoring strategies in pediatric transplantation.
Main Methods:
- Review of historical data and clinical practice regarding CsA use in pediatric renal transplantation.
- Analysis of outcomes related to CsA dosing, monitoring, and combination therapies.
Main Results:
- CsA use decreased acute rejections and increased graft survival rates.
- CsA-based regimens improved pediatric growth rates, attributed to reduced steroid co-administration.
- CsA microemulsion (1990s) improved absorption and reduced variability, further enhancing outcomes. Common side effects include nephrotoxicity and hirsutism.
Conclusions:
- Cyclosporine has been pivotal in improving pediatric renal transplant success, balancing efficacy with manageable side effects.
- Advanced CsA formulations, targeted monitoring (2-hour postdose levels), and combination therapies (antibody induction, mycophenolate mofetil, ToR inhibitors) continue to refine outcomes and mitigate toxicity.
Abstract:
Before the era of cyclosporine (CsA), immunosuppression with azathioprine and steroids resulted in high rejection rates and severe growth retardation in pediatric renal transplant recipients. In the early 1980s, immunosuppression with CsA was introduced for children. Because of differences in metabolism rates and relation of weight and body surface area, special pediatric dosing regimens and monitoring strategies had to be developed. Use of CsA led to a decreased number of acute rejections and, consequently, to a marked increase in graft survival rates. The growth rates of transplanted children were significantly higher under CsA-based immunosuppression than with classical regimens. This was due to a decreased need of steroid co-administration. Main side effects of CsA in children were nephrotoxicity and hirsutism. The introduction of CsA microemulsion in the 1990s led to more reliable absorption profiles and to a lower interindividual variability of CsA area-under-the-curve concentrations and thus to another improvement in rejection rates. New monitoring strategies, based on CsA levels taken 2 hours' postdose, seem promising. In pediatric transplantation, CsA is often successfully combined with an antibody-induction therapy in order to reduce the number of early acute rejections. Combination with mycophenolate mofetil reduces the appearance of chronic rejection. Additional therapy with ToR inhibitors might enforce a reduction of CsA doses and therefore lead to a reduction of CsA toxic effects.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution