Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
Published on: March 19, 2014
Food intake with an antiobesity drug (sibutramine) versus placebo and rorschach data: a crossover within-subjects
Kristina Elfhag1, Britta Barkeling, Anna Maria Carlsson
1Obesity Unit, Karolinska Institutet at Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Kristina.Elfhag@medhs.ki.se
Abstract:
We related the effect of the satiety enhancing drug sibutramine (Meridia, Reductil) on food intake to Rorschach Comprehensive System (Exner, 1991, 1993) personality factors. A placebo-controlled crossover, within-subjects design (n = 36) was used. Food intake after 2 weeks in the sibutramine and placebo conditions was assessed with a test meal using the VIKTOR (Cabmek, Stockholm, Sweden) setup, a computerized eating monitor. Building on baseline VIKTOR measurements, we had earlier studied the microstructure of eating (Elfhag, Barkeling, Carlsson, & Rossner, 2003). In this study, a model including Afr, MOR, and Populars could explain the variance in the effect of sibutramine. Sibutramine may reduce food intake in single test meals for participants whose appetite is prompted by external stimuli including food cues, suggested by the Affective ratio. Distress related to the body in obesity seen in damaged self-imagery (MOR) and adjustment to social expectations (Populars) could also have a moderating effect on the participants' consumption of test meals in an experimental design. Bodily concern (An + Xy) was also related to sibutramine response in univariate analyses.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
