Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Utilization review and managed health care liability.

Richard A Spector1

  • 1Middleberg, Riddle & Gianna, New Orleans, LA 70170, USA. rspector@midrid.com

Southern Medical Journal
|March 27, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Patients denied care by managed care insurance may have legal recourse. This jurisprudence review clarifies Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) protections and potential state malpractice claims for patient-specific denials.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'Off-label' prescribing, the Physician's Desk Reference and the court.

The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society·2012
Same author

Plaintiff's attorneys share perspectives on patient communication.

Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management·2010
Same author

Absence of physician recourse in malpractice litigation--malicious prosecution.

The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society·2002
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Health Law
  • Insurance Law
  • Medical Malpractice

Background:

  • Managed care organizations (MCOs) increasingly influence patient care decisions.
  • The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) governs many employer-sponsored health plans.
  • Litigation concerning MCOs' role in patient care denials is complex and evolving.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the legal landscape surrounding ERISA's application to managed care patient care denials.
  • To identify existing quality-of-care protections for patients under federal law.
  • To explore potential legal avenues for patients when care is denied based on specific medical reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Review of key legal precedents and scholarly articles on ERISA and managed care.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of judicial interpretations of ERISA's preemption clauses.
  • Examination of state tort law principles relevant to medical decision-making.

    • Main Results:

    • ERISA provides certain quality-of-care protections, but its preemption can limit state law claims.
    • When MCO utilization reviews deny care using patient-specific medical reasoning, a state law malpractice claim may be viable.
    • Distinguishing between benefit denials and medical decision-making is crucial for patient recourse.

    Conclusions:

    • Federal law, specifically ERISA, offers protections but also presents challenges for patients seeking recourse against managed care denials.
    • Patients may pursue state law malpractice claims when MCOs engage in medical decision-making that results in care denial.
    • Further legal development is needed to clarify the interplay between ERISA and state laws in managed care disputes.