Related Experiment Videos
Women in academic general surgery.
Anneke T Schroen1, Michelle R Brownstein, George F Sheldon
1Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, PO Box 800709, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0709, USA.
Summary
Gender disparities persist in academic general surgery, with women reporting fewer publications and feeling less career advancement. Addressing these differences is crucial for retaining talent in the field.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Education and Training
- Academic Medicine
- Surgical Workforce Diversity
Background:
- Academic general surgery faces challenges in retaining and advancing both male and female surgeons.
- Understanding gender-specific professional experiences is vital for improving career trajectories and productivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the professional experiences of men and women in academic general surgery.
- To identify factors influencing academic productivity and decisions to leave academia.
- To compare career satisfaction and advancement opportunities between genders.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to male and female members of the American College of Surgeons.
- Data collected included academic rank, career aspirations, publication rates, funding, workload, and personal factors.
- Responses from academic and tenure-track surgeons were analyzed by gender, age, and rank.
Main Results:
- Women academic surgeons published fewer articles (median 10) than men (median 25).
- Women reported lower perceived opportunities for career advancement and feelings of isolation.
- Women assistant professors were most likely to consider leaving academia (29%).
Conclusions:
- Significant gender-based differences exist in academic general surgery regarding productivity and career progression.
- Addressing these disparities is essential for fostering career development and attracting diverse talent.
- Creating equitable environments is critical for the future of academic general surgery.