Use of spectroscopic techniques for uranium(VI)/montmorillonite interaction modeling
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

A Novel Technique for Raman Analysis of Highly Radioactive Samples Using Any Standard Micro-Raman Spectrometer
Published on: April 12, 2017
A Kowal-Fouchard1, R Drot, E Simoni
1Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Groupe de Radiochimie, Université Paris XI, 91406 Orsay, France.
Abstract:
To experimentally identify both clay sorption sites and sorption equilibria and to understand the retention mechanisms at a molecular level, we have characterized the structure of hexavalent uranium surface complexes resulting from the interaction between the uranyl ions and the surface retention groups of a montmorillonite clay. We have performed laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy (LIFS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on uranyl ion loaded montmorillonite. These structural results were then compared to those obtained from the study of uranyl ions sorbed onto an alumina and also from U(VI) sorbed on an amorphous silica. This experimental approach allowed for a clear determination of the reactive surface sites of montmorillonite for U(VI) sorption. The lifetime values and the U4f XPS spectra of uranium(VI) sorbed on montmorillonite have shown that this ion is sorbed on both exchange and edge sites. The comparison of U(VI)/clay and U(VI)/oxide systems has determined that the interaction between uranyl ions and montmorillonite edge sites occurs via both [triple bond]AlOH and [triple bond]SiOH surface groups and involves three distinct surface complexes. The surface complexation modeling of the U(VI)/montmorillonite sorption edges was determined using the constant capacitance model and the above experimental constraints. The following equilibria were found to account for the uranyl sorption mechanisms onto montmorillonite for metal concentrations ranged from 10(-6) to 10(-3) M and two ionic strengths (0.1 and 0.5 M): 2[triple bond]XNa + UO2(2+) <==> ([triple bond]X)2UO2 + 2Na+, log K0(exch) = 3.0; [triple bond]Al(OH)2 + UO2(2+) <==> [triple bond]Al(OH)2UO2(2+), log K0(Al) = 14.9; [triple bond]Si(OH)2 + UO2(2+) <==> [triple bond]SiO2UO2 + 2H+, log K0(Si1) = -3.8; and [triple bond]Si(OH)2 + 3UO2(2+) + 5H2O <==> [triple bond]SiO2(UO2)3(OH)5- + 7H+, log K0(Si2) = -20.0.
More Related Videos
12:05U2O5 Film Preparation via UO2 Deposition by Direct Current Sputtering and Successive Oxidation and Reduction with Atomic Oxygen and Atomic Hydrogen
Published on: February 21, 2019
08:43Separation of Uranium and Thorium for 230Th-U Dating of Submarine Hydrothermal Sulfides
Published on: May 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
UV–Vis Spectrometers
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Woodward–Fieser Rules
UV–Vis Spectroscopy of Conjugated Systems
One of the factors influencing λmax is the extent of conjugation in the...
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Molecular Electronic Transitions
Interaction of EM Radiation with Matter: Spectroscopy
Ultraviolet and Visible (UV–Vis) Spectroscopy: Overview