Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Methods for the Discovery of Novel Compounds Modulating a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Type A Neurotransmission
Published on: August 16, 2018
Methylphenidate and MK-801, an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist: shared biological properties
1INSERM E 9935 and Service de Neurologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert-Debré, 48 BD Sérurier, 75019 Paris, France.
Abstract:
Methylphenidate (MPH), a dopamine reuptake inhibitor, is used increasingly to treat attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders in children. Given that dopaminergic mechanisms, contribute to the structural and functional maturation of brain circuitry, consideration of the potential influence of MPH in disrupting such processes seems warranted. Following a similar logic regarding the relevance of glutamate neurotransmission in mediating aspects of brain maturation, we and others have previously utilized in vivo and in vitro studies of the developing rodent brain to establish that MK-801, an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist has both neuroprotective and pro-apoptotic actions. In this study we used a neonatal murine model of excitotoxin-induced cortical injury to compare such actions between MPH and MK-801, and found that MPH shared some biological properties with MK-801. Specifically, both drugs were neuroprotective against excitotoxic challenge resulting in neonatal brain lesions and in vitro neuronal death, but both drugs also exacerbated programmed neural cell death. However, this profile of action was not shared by the dopamine reuptake blocker GBR-12783, a molecule which like MPH binds to and blocks the dopamine transporter, but which is structurally dissimilar to MPH, suggesting that inhibition of dopamine reuptake alone cannot explain the results from our MPH studies. The implications of our findings are that when studied in our developmental mouse model both drugs demonstrate similar capacities to be either neuroprotective or pro-apoptotic, depending on the specific biologic setting in which they act. Additional studies to identify some potential positive as well as negative consequences of exposure to these drugs during brain development in clinical settings are warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of the aromatic...
Adrenergic Agonists: Indirect-Acting Agents
One mechanism involves depleting stored catecholamines by displacing them from synaptic vesicles. These agents, known as "displacers," are transported into vesicles at the expense of noradrenaline. Examples include amphetamine and tyramine, which lack a catechol moiety, resulting in prolonged action, improved oral bioavailability, and...
Adrenergic Agonists: Mixed-Action Agents
Ephedrine and pseudoephedrine lack a catecholamine group, making them less susceptible to degradation by metabolic enzymes. They have increased oral bioavailability and lipophilicity, resulting in a longer duration of action. Their response is reduced by...
Drugs Affecting Neurotransmitter Release or Uptake
Adrenergic Agonists: Direct-Acting Agents
These agents can be classified...
Drugs Acting on Autonomic Ganglia: Stimulants
Ganglionic stimulants activate NM nicotinic receptors in autonomic ganglia, falling into two categories: nicotine mimetics [e.g., lobeline, dimethylpiperazine, tetramethylammonium] and muscarinic receptor agonists [e.g., muscarine, methacholine]. The first category's action is rapid and blocked by nicotinic receptor antagonists, while the second category's action is delayed and blocked by atropine-like agents. Nicotine, an alkaloid, affects the heart rate by stimulating sympathetic or...

