Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mechanical heart valves: are two leaflets better than one?

YingXing Wu1, Rosario Gregorio, Attilio Renzulli

  • 1Medical Data Research, Providence Health System, Portland, OR 97225, USA. yingxing.wu@providence.org

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|March 31, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Mechanical heart valve choice matters less than previously thought. Both single-disc and bileaflet aortic valves show similar long-term clinical outcomes, suggesting current preferences may not be outcome-driven.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endo-epicardial strategy in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation: Clinical outcomes in terms of atrial fibrillation recurrences and burden during continuous monitoring.

Kardiologia polska·2026
Same author

Outcome After Surgery for Type A Intramural Hematoma.

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease·2026
Same author

Methods for Wearable-Derived Pulse Rate Measures and Their Application to Modeling the Relationship between Pulse Rate and Motor Activity in Narcolepsy Type 1.

Digital biomarkers·2026
Same author

Functional Regression Methods for Estimating 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Parameters in Narcolepsy Type 1.

Digital biomarkers·2026
Same author

Specialty and operator status influence electronic health record use variation.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same author

Risk Profile and Outcomes of Patients Requiring Coronary Revascularization as Concomitant Procedure to Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Mechanical heart valves are crucial for aortic valve replacement.
  • Single-disc and bileaflet designs represent distinct technological approaches.
  • Long-term comparative clinical outcomes are essential for guiding clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare long-term clinical outcomes of isolated aortic valve replacement using single-disc versus bileaflet mechanical heart valves.
  • To evaluate survival and valve-related events between the two mechanical valve types.
  • To determine if current clinical preferences for bileaflet valves are supported by evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 590 single-disc and 1283 bileaflet valves implanted for isolated aortic valve replacement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Follow-up extended to over 27 years for single-disc valves and 21 years for bileaflet valves.
  • Analysis of survival, explantation rates, thromboembolism, and other valve-related complications.
  • Main Results:

    • Bileaflet valves demonstrated a significantly lower explantation rate.
    • Single-disc valves showed a significantly lower thromboembolism rate.
    • No significant differences were observed in early mortality, long-term survival, or other complications between valve types.

    Conclusions:

    • Single-disc and bileaflet mechanical heart valves offer comparable long-term clinical performance.
    • The widespread adoption of bileaflet valves may not be solely based on superior clinical outcomes.
    • Further research may explore other factors influencing valve selection.