Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intellectual property conundrum for the biological sciences.

James L Olds1

  • 1Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study and the School of Computational Sciences Program in Computational Neurosciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. jolds@gmu.edu

Anatomical Record. Part B, New Anatomist
|March 31, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Academic biomedical intellectual property (IP) policy, influenced by the Vannevar Bush report and Bayh-Dole Act, faces implementation challenges due to differing motivations among scientists, officials, and entrepreneurs. Addressing these differences can enhance future technology transfer.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When neuro-robots go wrong: A review.

Frontiers in neurorobotics·2023
Same author

Explainable AI: A Neurally-Inspired Decision Stack Framework.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Nicotinic receptor targeting in physiological and environmental vulnerability: A whole of biosphere perspective.

The Science of the total environment·2021
Same author

Does COVID19 Infect the Brain? If So, Smokers Might Be at a Higher Risk.

Molecular pharmacology·2020
Same author

Is nicotine exposure linked to cardiopulmonary vulnerability to COVID-19 in the general population?

The FEBS journal·2020
Same author

Microbial resolution of whole genome shotgun and 16S amplicon metagenomic sequencing using publicly available NEON data.

PloS one·2020

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Science
  • Technology Transfer Policy
  • Intellectual Property Management

Background:

  • The Vannevar Bush report (1945) and the Bayh-Dole Act (1980) significantly shaped U.S. academic biomedical intellectual property (IP) policy.
  • This policy transfers federally funded research IP from the government to academic institutions to stimulate the economy.
  • Despite its goals, the policy implementation has encountered substantial challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the implementation challenges of academic biomedical IP policy.
  • To identify the root causes of these challenges, focusing on motivational differences.
  • To propose a review of policy to improve technology transfer.

Main Methods:

  • The study presents an argument based on the analysis of policy evolution and implementation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It examines the structural differences in motivations between key stakeholders.
  • The approach involves a conceptual review of existing policy frameworks.

    • Main Results:

    • Implementation difficulties stem from divergent motivations among biomedical scientists, institutional officials, and private sector entrepreneurs.
    • These motivational discrepancies create friction in the technology transfer process.
    • Current policy structures may not adequately account for these varied incentives.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the distinct motivations of stakeholders is crucial for effective policy.
    • A review of academic biomedical IP policy is recommended to enhance technology transfer.
    • Aligning stakeholder incentives could improve the translation of research into economic benefits and health advancements.