Spina bifida at the sacral level: more than minor gait disturbances

M A G C Schoenmakers1, V A M Gulmans, R H J M Gooskens

  • 1Department of Paediatric Physiotherapy, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands. M.A.G.C.Schoenmakers@wkz.azu.nl

Insights

Children with myelomeningocele (MMC) and lipomyelomeningocele (LMMC) experience functional challenges. The MMC group shows greater muscle weakness and motor deficits, requiring significant caregiver support for bladder and bowel management.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric neurology
  • Rehabilitation medicine
  • Spina bifida research

Background:

  • Sacral level paralysis in children presents unique functional outcomes.
  • Myelomeningocele (MMC) and lipomyelomeningocele (LMMC) are distinct forms of spina bifida with varying prognoses.
  • Understanding functional differences is crucial for targeted interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare functional outcomes in children with myelomeningocele (MMC) versus lipomyelomeningocele (LMMC).
  • To assess differences in muscle strength, ambulation, and motor performance between the two groups.
  • To identify specific areas of disability and caregiver assistance needs.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional study involving clinical assessment and disability measurement.
  • Inclusion of 30 children with MMC and 14 with LMMC.
  • Utilized measures such as muscle strength, ambulation level, BSID, ABC, and PEDI.

Main Results:

  • The majority of children in both groups were ambulant.
  • Ambulation strongly correlated with hip abductor and ankle dorsal-flexor muscle strength.
  • The MMC group exhibited significantly lower muscle strength and motor performance compared to the LMMC group.

Conclusions:

  • Both MMC and LMMC groups face gross motor and functional challenges.
  • Children with MMC demonstrate more pronounced muscle weakness and motor impairments.
  • Prolonged caregiver assistance is necessary for bladder and bowel management in both groups, impacting school-aged children.
Abstract