Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

14:14
Simultaneous Quantification of T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles (TRECs) and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles (KRECs) by Real-time PCR
Published on: December 6, 2014
Quantitative nested reverse transcriptase PCR vs. real-time PCR for measuring AML1/ETO (MTG8) transcripts
M Takenokuchi1, C Yasuda, K Takeuchi
1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Clinical and Laboratory Haematology
|April 1, 2004
Summary
A new quantitative nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (QN-RT-PCR) method offers superior sensitivity for detecting the AML1/ETO fusion transcript. This advanced technique aids in predicting relapse and quantifying minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia patients.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) translocation involves the AML1/ETO fusion transcript.
- Accurate detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is crucial for predicting relapse and guiding treatment.
- Existing real-time PCR methods have limitations in sensitivity for MRD detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a highly sensitive quantitative nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (QN-RT-PCR) method.
- To compare the sensitivity of QN-RT-PCR with existing real-time PCR methods for detecting the AML1/ETO fusion transcript.
- To assess the utility of QN-RT-PCR for predicting hematological relapse and quantifying MRD in AML patients.
Main Methods:
- Development of a QN-RT-PCR assay using a plasmid cDNA standard containing the AML1/ETO fusion transcript.
- Detection limits were determined for both plasmid standards and spiked cancer cells.
- Comparison of QN-RT-PCR with real-time PCR in clinical samples from AML patients in remission.
Main Results:
- The QN-RT-PCR method demonstrated a higher sensitivity, detecting the fusion transcript at 10(-17) m, compared to 10(-16) m for real-time PCR.
- QN-RT-PCR detected the transcript 60 days before relapse in one patient, versus 10 days for real-time PCR.
- Significant quantitative differences in MRD levels were observed between patients achieving remission via chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation versus chemotherapy alone.
Conclusions:
- The developed QN-RT-PCR method is significantly more sensitive than conventional real-time PCR for detecting the AML1/ETO fusion transcript.
- This enhanced sensitivity allows for earlier prediction of hematological relapse in AML patients.
- QN-RT-PCR provides a valuable tool for precise quantitative assessment of MRD, differentiating treatment outcomes.

