Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Two-photon Imaging of Intracellular Ca2+ Handling and Nitric Oxide Production in Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells of an Isolated Rat Aorta
Published on: June 10, 2015
Nitric oxide inhibition accelerates hypertension and induces perivascular inflammation in rats
Nan-Kuang Hsieh1, Jia-Yi Wang, Jiang-Chuan Liu
1Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract:
1. Inflammatory changes in peripheral arteries have been reported in animal models of hypertension. Whether they occur in cerebral arteries (CA) with hypertension induced by deprivation of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) remains unknown. 2. In the present study, we compared the arteriolar injury score (AIS) and perivascular inflammation in CA between hypertensive and normotensive rats following NO deprivation with the NO synthase inhibitor N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Five-week-old male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Wistar -Kyoto (WKY) rats were fed with L-NAME (1 mg/mL) for 4 weeks. 3. Nitric oxide deprivation resulted in time-dependent elevations in tail-cuff pressure (representing systolic blood pressure (SBP)) in both SHR and WKY rats. The magnitude of increase in SBP was larger in SHR (+81.0 +/- 3.2 vs+25.0 +/- 2.2 mmHg; P < 0.01). Arteriolar hyalinosis and AIS in various segments of the CA were assessed with periodic acid-Schiff staining and inflammatory cells were immunostained with the antibody against macrophage/monocyte marker (ED1). The ED1+ cells appeared in the middle CA of L-NAME-treated SHR as early as 2 weeks after treatment. These cells were not observed in L-NAME-treated WKY rats and untreated SHR. More ED1+ cells were found in L-NAME-treated SHR than L-NAME-treated WKY rats after 4 weeks treatment. 4. The AIS and number of ED1+ cells around the perivascular area of the internal carotid artery were significantly higher in L-NAME-treated compared with untreated rats (AIS: 137 +/- 28 vs 46 +/- 10 for WKY rats, respectively; 169 +/- 18 vs 53 +/- 6 for SHR, respectively (P < 0.01); ED1+ cells: 7.9 +/- 0.6 vs 1.3 +/- 0.9 for WKY rats, respectively; 13.6 +/- 2.7 vs 2.1 +/- 0.9 for SHR, respectively (P < 0.01)), although SBP was higher in untreated SHR than in L-NAME-treated WKY rats (170 +/- 4 vs 137 +/- 4 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.05). 5. These findings suggest that ED1+ cells appeared in the middle CA of L-NAME-SHR as early as 2 weeks after treatment. Chronic inhibition of NO accelerates hypertension and induces perivascular inflammation.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Vasodilators
Nitric Oxide Signaling Pathway
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
