Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cytogenetic biomarkers.

Hannu Norppa1

  • 1Department of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki. hannu.norppa@ttl.fi

IARC Scientific Publications
|April 2, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Objectives and achievements of the HUMN project on its 26th anniversary.

Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research·2024
Same author

Chromosome-specific induction of micronuclei and chromosomal aberrations by mitomycin C: Involvement of human chromosomes 9, 1 and 16.

Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis·2024
Same author

HBM4EU Chromates Study-Genotoxicity and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Workers Exposed to Hexavalent Chromium.

Toxics·2022
Same author

Biomarkers of nanomaterials hazard from multi-layer data.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Effect of Surface Modification on the Pulmonary and Systemic Toxicity of Cellulose Nanofibrils.

Biomacromolecules·2022
Same author

Surface functionalization and size modulate the formation of reactive oxygen species and genotoxic effects of cellulose nanofibrils.

Particle and fibre toxicology·2022

Cytogenetic biomarkers like chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei monitor genotoxic exposure. Genetic variations in enzymes like GSTM1 and NAT2 influence these biomarkers, impacting cancer risk and sensitivity to environmental toxins.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental epigenetics
  • Molecular toxicology
  • Cancer epidemiology

Background:

  • Cytogenetic biomarkers, including chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, and micronuclei in peripheral blood lymphocytes, are established tools for monitoring human genotoxic exposure and early carcinogenic effects.
  • These biomarkers are relevant as most human carcinogens induce chromosomal damage, and high frequencies of chromosomal aberrations correlate with increased cancer risk.
  • Biomarker frequencies naturally increase with age, notably micronuclei in women, and are influenced by lifestyle factors like tobacco smoking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of genetic polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes on cytogenetic biomarkers.
  • To explore the association between specific genetic variations and sensitivity to genotoxic agents.
  • To understand how genetic factors modulate the impact of environmental exposures on cellular damage.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, and micronuclei frequencies in peripheral blood lymphocytes.
  • Genotyping for polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1 null genotype), N-Acetyltransferase (NAT2 slow acetylation), and glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1 null genotype).
  • Correlation of biomarker frequencies with genetic polymorphisms and exposure data.

Main Results:

  • The absence of the glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1 null genotype) was linked to heightened sensitivity to tobacco smoke's genotoxicity.
  • N-Acetyltransferase (NAT2 slow acetylation) genotypes correlated with elevated baseline chromosomal aberration levels.
  • Deletion of the glutathione S-transferase T1 gene (GSTT1 null genotype) was associated with increased baseline sister chromatid exchange frequency.
  • These associations may stem from reduced detoxification capacities, potentially linked to exposures like heterocyclic amines (NAT2) or ethylene oxide (GSTT1).

Conclusions:

  • Genetic polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes significantly modulate cytogenetic biomarkers, influencing individual susceptibility to genotoxic agents.
  • Variations in GSTM1, NAT2, and GSTT1 impact baseline levels and responses to environmental exposures, suggesting a role in cancer risk.
  • Further research into DNA repair polymorphisms is warranted to fully elucidate their role in modulating genotoxic effects and cytogenetic biomarkers.