Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Stakeholders' views about cardiac report cards: a qualitative study
Cécile M Bensimon1, Naomi Nohara, Douglas K Martin
1Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Ontario.
Insights
Understanding stakeholder perspectives is crucial for developing effective cardiac care report cards. This study highlights key themes for accountability, education, and informed decision-making in cardiac report card design.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Health Informatics
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Health care report cards are tools to inform stakeholders about health care quality and outcomes.
- Cardiac care report cards are relatively well-developed, but stakeholder perspectives require systematic description.
- Understanding the views of those involved is essential for effective report card development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically describe the views and expectations of various stakeholders regarding cardiac report cards.
- To identify key themes influencing the design and implementation of cardiac report cards.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study involving person-to-person interviews with 58 stakeholders across seven Canadian cities.
- Participants included administrators, nurses, cardiologists, outcomes researchers, cardiac surgeons, and media representatives.
- Interview data were analyzed and organized into thematic categories.
Main Results:
- Stakeholders identified two primary purposes for report cards: accountability for quality and public education/informed decision-making.
- Multistakeholder collaboration was emphasized as crucial for report card development.
- Key content considerations included context, reporting levels, and data; dissemination via the internet, media, and direct provider communication was discussed.
Conclusions:
- Stakeholder views provide a foundation for an evidence-based framework to guide the development, implementation, and delivery of cardiac report cards.
- The study describes the perspectives of healthcare professionals and media; future research should include patient views.
- Incorporating diverse stakeholder input is vital for creating functional and impactful cardiac report cards.
Context:
Health care report cards provide stakeholders with information on health care outcomes and other measures of care. Report cards are most well developed in cardiac care. A necessary first step to ground the development of cardiac report cards in actual experience is to understand the views of those most closely involved. To date, there has been no systematic description of stakeholders' views.
Objective:
To describe stakeholders' views about cardiac report cards.
Design:
The present study involved qualitative person-to-person interviews with 58 stakeholders from seven Canadian cities with major cardiac programs: Vancouver, Calgary, London, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and Halifax.
Participants:
A total of 58 participants from six stakeholder groups in cardiac care consisting of 15 administrators, 13 nurses, 12 cardiologists, seven outcomes researchers, six cardiac surgeons and five members of the media who report on health care.
Outcome Measures:
Participants' views and expectations of cardiac report cards were analyzed and organized into themes.
Results:
The views of stakeholders on cardiac report cards were organized according to four themes:
Purpose:
Participants identified two purposes--accountability for quality care as well as public education and informed decision-making;
Development:
Participants thought that the development of report cards should involve multistakeholder collaboration;
Content:
Participants discussed three concepts--context, level of reporting and data; and Dissemination: Mechanisms discussed include the Internet, media and directly to health care providers.
Conclusions:
The views of stakeholders regarding cardiac report cards can be the basis of an evidence-based conceptual framework that can guide in the development, implementation and delivery of cardiac report cards. In the present study, the views of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, cardiac nurses, administrators, outcomes researchers and members of media are described. A next step is to explore the views of cardiac patients.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Angina V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care