Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interrater reliability in professional psychology student selection.

Anthony L Pillay1, Stephen D Edwards

  • 1University of Natal.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|April 3, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Academics showed high agreement when selecting students for psychology training. Female raters demonstrated greater consistency than male raters in their evaluations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HeartMath as an Integrative, Personal, Social, and Global Healthcare System.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

HeartMath Coherence Model Throws New Light on Arka Dhyana Intuitive Meditation.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Practitioners' Experiences of the Influence of Bonsai Art on Health.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2021
Same author

AI in the noosphere: an alignment of scientific and wisdom traditions.

AI & society·2020
Same author

The minimum age of criminal responsibility, international variation, and the Dual Systems Model in neurodevelopment.

Journal of child and adolescent mental health·2019
Same author

Depressive symptoms in first year students at a rural South African University.

Journal of affective disorders·2019

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Education

Background:

  • Student selection for professional psychology programs is critical.
  • Assessing rater reliability is essential for fair and consistent admissions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the interrater reliability among academics selecting students for professional psychology training.
  • To investigate potential gender differences in rater concordance.

Main Methods:

  • Academics served as raters for student selection.
  • Interrater reliability and concordance were statistically analyzed.
  • Analyses examined agreement for both male and female applicants.

Main Results:

  • High interrater reliability was observed among the academic raters.
  • Female raters exhibited higher concordance compared to male raters.
  • Significant agreement was found across all raters for both male and female applicants.

Conclusions:

  • The study confirms high reliability in academic judgments for psychology admissions.
  • Gender may influence rater concordance, with women showing higher agreement.
  • Consistent evaluation standards are applied by raters regardless of applicant gender.

Related Experiment Videos