Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Leveraging Turbidity and Thromboelastography for Complementary Clot Characterization
Published on: June 4, 2020
Role of the Thrombelastograph as an adjunctive test in thrombophilia screening
James O'Donnell1, Anne Riddell, Dale Owens
1Department of Haematology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK. j.odonnell@imperial.ac.uk
The Thrombelastograph (TEG) provides a global assessment of haemostatic function. We have investigated the potential role of TEG in thrombophilia testing by studying 87 consecutive patients (all with personal or family history of thrombosis). For each patient, routine thrombophilia screening tests and TEG were performed in parallel. In keeping with previous reports, at least one thrombophilic trait was identified in 34% of the patients. Among those patients with previous thrombosis, the yield from screening was higher (54% with prothrombotic trait). Overall, a hypercoaguable TEG was demonstrated in 45% of patients. However, TEG and standard thrombophilia testing did not necessarily identify the same subset of individuals. Of 39 patients with hypercoaguable TEG, only 17 had a demonstrable thrombophilic trait. Conversely, of 30 patients with proven thrombophilia, 17 also had a hypercoaguable TEG. We conclude that TEG cannot be used as a sole initial screening test in patients referred for thrombophilia testing, as it fails to identify 43% of underlying thrombophilic traits. However, TEG may be a useful adjunctive test, particularly in patients in whom the regular thrombophilia screen proves unremarkable. Prospective studies are warranted to determine whether a hypercoaguable TEG can be used to predict a subset of patients at increased risk for recurrent thrombotic events.
The Thrombelastograph (TEG) provides a global assessment of haemostatic function. We have investigated the potential role of TEG in thrombophilia testing by studying 87 consecutive patients (all with personal or family history of thrombosis). For each patient, routine thrombophilia screening tests and TEG were performed in parallel. In keeping with previous reports, at least one thrombophilic trait was identified in 34% of the patients. Among those patients with previous thrombosis, the yield from screening was higher (54% with prothrombotic trait). Overall, a hypercoaguable TEG was demonstrated in 45% of patients. However, TEG and standard thrombophilia testing did not necessarily identify the same subset of individuals. Of 39 patients with hypercoaguable TEG, only 17 had a demonstrable thrombophilic trait. Conversely, of 30 patients with proven thrombophilia, 17 also had a hypercoaguable TEG. We conclude that TEG cannot be used as a sole initial screening test in patients referred for thrombophilia testing, as it fails to identify 43% of underlying thrombophilic traits. However, TEG may be a useful adjunctive test, particularly in patients in whom the regular thrombophilia screen proves unremarkable. Prospective studies are warranted to determine whether a hypercoaguable TEG can be used to predict a subset of patients at increased risk for recurrent thrombotic events.
More Related Videos
08:50Thrombus Profiling Assay: A Microfluidics-Based Platform for Comprehensively Characterizing Biomechanical Thrombogenesis
Published on: January 9, 2026
08:01The Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay: Simultaneous Fluorogenic Measurement of Thrombin and Plasmin Generation in a Single Well
Published on: February 27, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins