Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026

Multiplexed Fluorometric ImmunoAssay Testing Methodology and Troubleshooting
Published on: December 12, 2011
Analytical performance and method comparison study of the total homocysteine fluorescence polarization immunoassay
Silvia Lonati1, Cristina Novembrino, Silvia Ippolito
1Dipartimento Scienze Mediche, Università degli Studi, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Milano, Milan, Italy.
Abstract:
A fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) has been commercially released for routine large-scale testing of total homocysteine (tHcy) on the AxSYM analyzer. We evaluated the analytical performance of the AxSYM tHcy FPIA and compared it with the well established high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and IMx tHcy FPIA methods. Homocysteine concentrations were measured by AxSYM and IMx tHcy FPIA and by a rapid isocratic HPLC method with fluorescence detection. Coefficient of variation (CV) of total imprecision for AxSYM tHcy was < or = 5%, mean dilution recovery 102%, analytical sensitivity 0.70 micromol/l and linearity was good up to 1:8 dilution. Spearman rank correlations, rho, were 0.83 (p < 0.0001) for AxSYM vs. HPLC, 0.97 (p < 0.0001) for AxSYM vs. IMx and 0.83 (p < 0.0001) for IMx vs. HPLC. Passing and Bablok regression Y-intercepts and slopes were: 2.944/0.937 (AxSYM vs. HPLC), -0.367/ 1.142 (AxSYM vs. IMx) and 2.632/0.805 (IMx vs. HPLC). Corresponding mean differences (AxSYM-Comparison Assay) recorded over a 5-50 micromol/l measured range were 1.80, -0.73 and 2.53 micromol/l. AxSYM tHcy FPIA's first rate precision, supported by the complete automation of the AxSYM analyzer, makes it fit for routine use and suitable for laboratories requiring homocysteine high-throughput testing capabilities.
