Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Translational control: a cup half full.

Paul M Macdonald1

  • 1Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Section of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712-0159, USA. pmacdonald@mail.utexas.edu

Current Biology : CB
|April 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Knock down analysis reveals critical phases for specific oskar noncoding RNA functions during Drosophila oogenesis.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2021
Same author

Opposing roles for Egalitarian and Staufen in transport, anchoring and localization of oskar mRNA in the Drosophila oocyte.

PLoS genetics·2021
Same author

Different roles for the adjoining and structurally similar A-rich and poly(A) domains of oskar mRNA: Only the A-rich domain is required for oskar noncoding RNA function, which includes MTOC positioning.

Developmental biology·2021
Same author

Multiple <i>cis</i>-acting signals, some weak by necessity, collectively direct robust transport of <i>oskar</i> mRNA to the oocyte.

Journal of cell science·2017
Same author

Community effects in regulation of translation.

eLife·2016
Same author

RNA sequences required for the noncoding function of oskar RNA also mediate regulation of Oskar protein expression by Bicoid Stability Factor.

Developmental biology·2015
Same journal

Hunting ecology predicts eye arrangements in the modular visual system of spiders.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Sub-second fluctuations between top-down and bottom-up modes distinguish diverse human brain states.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Queen bees offload pesticide burden to eggs when social buffering is overwhelmed.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Pitch selectivity in ferret auditory cortex.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

A cell size-dependent competition between geometry and polarity governs nuclear and spindle positioning in early embryos.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Trophic cascades drive sustainability in the agricultural heritage rice-fish coculture system.

Current biology : CB·2026
See all related articles

Cup protein represses oskar and nanos messenger RNAs (mRNAs) translation, which is crucial for Drosophila body patterning. This mechanism is similar to how Xenopus Maskin protein functions.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Proper body patterning in Drosophila relies on the precise regulation of gene expression.
  • The localization and translation of specific messenger RNAs (mRNAs), such as oskar and nanos, are critical for establishing anterior-posterior polarity.
  • Prior to their localization, the translation of these mRNAs must be repressed to ensure correct spatial and temporal control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of the Cup protein in the repression of oskar and nanos mRNA translation.
  • To elucidate the mechanism by which Cup protein regulates mRNA translation during early Drosophila development.
  • To compare the function of Cup protein with known translational repressors in other organisms, such as Xenopus Maskin.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized genetic screening and molecular biology techniques in Drosophila melanogaster.
  • Performed in vivo and in vitro assays to assess mRNA translation and protein binding.
  • Analyzed the interaction between Cup protein and oskar/nanos mRNAs.

Main Results:

  • The Cup protein was identified as a key regulator involved in repressing the translation of both oskar and nanos mRNAs.
  • Cup protein functions to prevent premature translation of these mRNAs before their localization to the posterior pole.
  • The mode of action of Cup protein in translational repression shows functional similarity to the Xenopus Maskin protein.

Conclusions:

  • Cup protein plays an essential role in controlling mRNA translation, thereby ensuring correct body patterning in Drosophila.
  • The findings highlight a conserved mechanism of translational repression across different species.
  • Cup protein represents a novel target for understanding the intricate regulation of gene expression in development.