Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current techniques in midface lifting.

Ali Namazie1, Daniel Alum, Gregory S Keller

  • 1Department of Surgery, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, 91206, USA.

Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America
|April 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biologic Improvement of Skin: Pathways and Activation of Stem Cells, Growth Factors, and Peptides.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Bioelectric Modulation as a Systems-Level Adjunct to Regenerative Therapies in Facial Plastic Surgery and Hair Restoration.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same authorSame journal

Healing from Within: Biologics in Facial Plastic Surgery.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Endoscopic Brow Lifting: A 35-Year Experience and Lessons Learned.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2025
Same author

The Deep Fascia of the Infraorbital Region, Deep Plane, and Suprafibromuscular Facelift: New Anatomy for Safer Facelifting.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2022
Same author

Wetland cohesion is associated with increased probability of infection by the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis.

Diseases of aquatic organisms·2022

Midface elevation techniques are evolving, offering less invasive options for facial rejuvenation in younger patients. These newer procedures create a natural, youthful appearance with minimal scarring and tissue manipulation.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Facial Rejuvenation
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • Midface aging affects facial aesthetics, leading to a loss of youthful contours.
  • Traditional midface lifts often involve significant tissue manipulation and visible scarring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe current trends in midface elevation procedures.
  • To highlight the benefits of less invasive techniques for facial rejuvenation.

Main Methods:

  • Endoscopic and percutaneous techniques for midface soft tissue manipulation.
  • Transblepharoplasty approaches for midface elevation.
  • Combination with traditional face and neck lifts for comprehensive facial rejuvenation.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Newer techniques allow for rejuvenation of younger patients' facial features.
  • Procedures result in a natural, unoperated, and youthful midface appearance.
  • Combined procedures address significant facial skin excess, restoring facial and neck harmony.

Conclusions:

  • Evolving midface elevation techniques offer improved aesthetic outcomes with less invasiveness.
  • Endoscopic and percutaneous methods are effective for achieving natural-looking facial rejuvenation.
  • These advancements provide options for younger patients and those with significant skin laxity.