Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contextual interference in movements of the same class: differential effects on program and parameter learning.

G Wulf1, T D Lee

  • 1Max-Planck-lnstitut für Psychologische Forschung, Leopoldstrasse 24, 8000 München, Germany. wulf@de.dbp.mpg.mpipf-muenchen

Journal of Motor Behavior
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting adverse events for risk stratification of chemotherapy based stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

[When AIHA does not explain everything: parvovirus B19 infection and pancytopenia as a differential diagnostic challenge].

Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Peripheral T- and natural killer-cell lymphomas: ESMO-EHA Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025
Same author

Lemon Juice in Acute Rheumatism.

Western journal of medicine and surgery·2024
Same author

Drug monitoring during ciprofloxacin prophylaxis of allogeneic stem cell transplant patients: associations with bacterial infections through a monocentric observational prospective study.

The Journal of hospital infection·2023
Same author

Randomized phase-III study of low-dose cytarabine and etoposide + /- all-trans retinoic acid in older unfit patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.

Scientific reports·2023
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Exploratory Procedures in Perceiving Affordances in a Bimanual Wielding Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Random practice enhances learning of the core movement pattern (generalized motor program) but hinders learning of specific movement details (parameters) compared to blocked practice. This finding challenges previous motor learning research.

Area of Science:

  • Motor Learning
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Contextual interference effects in motor learning are typically observed when tasks require different generalized motor programs (GMPs).
  • Previous research suggested random practice is less effective than blocked practice when tasks share the same GMP but differ in parameters.
  • Global error measures in prior studies confounded relative and absolute timing errors, obscuring nuanced learning effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential effects of random versus blocked practice on learning distinct aspects of motor skills.
  • To examine how practice schedules influence the acquisition of relative timing (GMP learning) and absolute timing (parameter learning).
  • To clarify the role of error measurement in understanding contextual interference in motor skill acquisition.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Participants practiced three movement patterns with identical relative timing (same GMP) but varying overall durations (different parameters).
  • Errors in relative timing and absolute timing were assessed independently to differentiate learning components.
  • A comparative analysis of random practice versus blocked practice was conducted.

Main Results:

  • Random practice significantly improved the learning of relative timing, indicating enhanced generalized motor program (GMP) acquisition.
  • Conversely, random practice was less effective for learning absolute timing, suggesting interference with parameter-specific learning.
  • Blocked practice showed the opposite pattern, benefiting absolute timing more than relative timing.

Conclusions:

  • The effectiveness of random versus blocked practice depends on the specific learning component targeted (GMP vs. parameters).
  • Separate assessment of timing errors is crucial for understanding contextual interference effects in motor learning.
  • This study refines theories of motor learning by demonstrating task-specific impacts of practice variability.