Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Error processing in pointing at randomly feedback-induced double-step stimuli.

E Komilis1, D Pélisson, C Prablanc

  • 1Department of Education, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adapting terminology: clarifying prism adaptation vocabulary, concepts, and methods.

Neuroscience research·2019
Same author

Are Covert Saccade Functionally Relevant in Vestibular Hypofunction?

Cerebellum (London, England)·2017
Same author

Long-term sensorimotor and therapeutical effects of a mild regime of prism adaptation in spatial neglect. A double-blind RCT essay.

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2014
Same author

Effects of structural and functional cerebellar lesions on sensorimotor adaptation of saccades.

Experimental brain research·2013
Same author

[Saccadic system plasticity mechanisms in Parkinson disease patients].

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2011
Same author

Persistent ocular motor manifestations and related visual consequences in multiple sclerosis.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2011
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Exploratory Procedures in Perceiving Affordances in a Bimanual Wielding Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Human arm movements adapt to unexpected target changes, with corrections occurring during deceleration. This motor control is largely independent of visual feedback, especially when perturbations happen early in the movement.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Understanding the precise mechanisms governing human arm trajectory planning and execution is crucial for fields like robotics and rehabilitation.
  • Previous research has explored how the brain controls limb movements, but the dynamic interplay between sensory feedback and motor adjustments remains an active area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the spatial and temporal organization of arm trajectories during pointing movements with single- and double-step target displacements.
  • To determine the role of visual reafference in correcting arm trajectories following unexpected target perturbations.
  • To examine how the timing of target perturbation influences motor response adjustments.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving human subjects performing pointing tasks to targets with single- and double-step displacements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 1: Pointing without vision of the moving hand. Experiment 2: Pointing with vision of the moving hand.
  • Target perturbations were introduced randomly at either the onset or peak velocity of hand movement.

    • Main Results:

    • Subjects successfully corrected their arm trajectories to accommodate double-step target perturbations, irrespective of visual feedback availability.
    • Asymmetrical velocity profiles were observed in responses, with a fixed acceleration phase regardless of perturbation timing.
    • Perturbations at movement onset allowed significant modulation of the deceleration phase (88-100% compensation), while perturbations at peak velocity resulted in limited compensation (20-40%).

    Conclusions:

    • Motor error is dynamically evaluated during the acceleration phase, enabling trajectory adjustments during deceleration.
    • The primary corrective process for perturbed arm movements is largely independent of visual reafference.
    • The timing of target perturbation critically affects the ability to modulate the deceleration phase and accurately compensate for displacement.