Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Historical background: Why is it important to improve automated particle selection methods?

Robert M Glaeser1

  • 1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3206, USA. rmglaeser@lbl.gov

Journal of Structural Biology
|April 7, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Automating particle selection in single-particle electron microscopy is crucial for large datasets. Current methods struggle with efficiency and reliability, necessitating new approaches and open-access data for validation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laser phase plate improves structure determination of small proteins by cryo-EM.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Liquid Phase Biological Electron Microscopy: Many Published Results and Claimed Benefits Are Fantasy, Not Fact.

Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada·2025
Same author

Commonsense and common nonsense opinions: PROSPECTS for further reducing beam damage in electron microscopy of radiation-sensitive specimens.

Ultramicroscopy·2025
Same author

Cryo-EM phase-plate images reveal unexpected levels of apparent specimen damage.

Journal of structural biology·2024
Same author

Cryo-EM phase-plate images reveal unexpected levels of apparent specimen damage.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Modern approaches to improving phase contrast electron microscopy.

Current opinion in structural biology·2024

Area of Science:

  • Structural Biology
  • Microscopy Techniques
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Single-particle electron microscopy (SPEM) is advancing, with increasing dataset sizes.
  • Manual particle selection is a significant bottleneck in SPEM data processing.
  • Fully automated particle selection methods lack sufficient efficiency and reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the bottleneck of manual particle selection in large SPEM datasets.
  • To explore and highlight potential improvements for automated particle selection algorithms.
  • To emphasize the need for standardized data resources to advance automated methods.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current trends and challenges in automated particle selection for SPEM.
  • Discussion of limitations of simple methods like cross-correlation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of incorporating geometric properties and integrated mass for particle identification.
  • Consideration of dual-defocus image acquisition strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • Simple methods like cross-correlation are insufficient for reliable automated particle selection.
    • Geometric properties and integrated mass show promise for improving automated selection.
    • Dual-defocus imaging can enhance particle visibility and aid selection.
    • The development of automated particle selection is hindered by a lack of standardized datasets.

    Conclusions:

    • Fully automated particle selection in SPEM remains a challenge requiring further methodological development.
    • Integrating particle geometric and mass properties, alongside dual-defocus imaging, may improve automated selection accuracy.
    • Establishment of well-annotated, open-access datasets is essential for validating and advancing automated particle selection techniques.