Iron lung versus conventional mechanical ventilation in acute exacerbation of COPD

The aim of this randomised study was to compare the effects of iron lung ventilation (ILV) with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Forty-four patients with ARF were assigned either to ILV (22 patients) or IMV (22 patients). Primary end-points were the improvement in gas exchange and complications related to mechanical ventilation. On admission ILV and IMV groups did not differ in age, simplified acute physiology score II, arterial oxygen tension (Pa,O2)/inspiratory oxygen fraction (FI,O2), arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pa,CO2) and pH. Compared with baseline, ILV and IMV induced a similar and significant improvement in Pa,O2/FI,O2, Pa,CO2 and pH after 1 h of treatment and at discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Major complications tended to be more frequent in patients treated with IMV than in those treated with ILV (27.3% versus 4.5%), whereas mortality rate was similar (27.3% versus 18.2%). The ventilator-free days and the length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the ILV than in the IMV group. This study suggests that iron lung ventilation is as effective as invasive mechanical ventilation in improving gas exchange in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute respiratory failure, and is associated with a tendency towards a lower rate of major complications.