Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How to rate performance: is a standardized patient the answer?

Charles C Coddington1, Deborah L Smith

  • 1University of Colorado Health Sciences Center and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80204, USA. charles.coddington@dhha.org

Fertility and Sterility
|April 7, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Clinicians evaluate in vitro fertilization (IVF) effectiveness for practice improvement. However, using standardized patients to compare IVF outcomes is a questionable method for assessing success.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experience of racism among Massachusetts mothers by history of infertility treatment.

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same author

Lower Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates with Vaginal Endometrin Plus Intramuscular Progesterone Every Third Day Versus Intramuscular Progesterone Alone in Programmed Frozen Embryo Transfers: A Retrospective Case-control Study.

Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)·2024
Same author

Assisted Reproductive Technology or Infertility: What underlies adverse outcomes? Lessons from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

F&S reviews·2022
Same author

Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a registry linkage study from Massachusetts.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2022
Same author

Pregnancy outcomes among women with endometriosis and fibroids: registry linkage study in Massachusetts.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2022
Same author

Hospitalizations up to 8 years following delivery in assisted reproductive technology-treated and subfertile women.

Fertility and sterility·2022

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive medicine
  • Clinical practice analysis
  • In vitro fertilization (IVF)

Background:

  • Clinicians routinely assess in vitro fertilization (IVF) effectiveness to enhance patient care.
  • Standardized patients are sometimes employed to evaluate clinical practice and outcomes.
  • The validity of using standardized patients for comparing IVF success rates is under scrutiny.

Discussion:

  • The current study questions the reliability of standardized patients in assessing the nuances of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes.
  • Evaluating IVF effectiveness requires methods that capture the complexity of patient-specific factors and treatment variations.
  • Over-reliance on standardized patient models may oversimplify the multifaceted nature of successful IVF.

Key Insights:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The effectiveness of in vitro fertilization (IVF) practice is under continuous review by clinicians for improvement.
  • The methodology of employing standardized patients to benchmark IVF outcomes is identified as a potential limitation.
  • Further research is needed to validate or refute the utility of standardized patients in IVF outcome assessment.

    • Outlook:

    • Future research should focus on developing more robust and patient-centered metrics for evaluating IVF effectiveness.
    • Exploring alternative methodologies for clinical practice improvement in reproductive medicine is recommended.
    • The findings may prompt a re-evaluation of assessment tools used in assisted reproductive technologies.