Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modelling non-demanders in choice experiments.

Mandy Ryan1, Diane Skåtun

  • 1Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. m.ryan@adbn.ac.uk

Health Economics
|April 7, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of rare diseases worth its cost? A user-based approach to valuation.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2025
Same author

'Get away from it all' or 'Too good to be true?': a qualitative exploration of job advertisements for remote and rural posts.

Rural and remote health·2025
Same author

'Come and work here!' Qualitative research exploring community-led initiatives to improve healthcare recruitment and retention in remote and rural areas.

Health and social care delivery research·2025
Same author

Beyond the Diagnosis: Valuing Genome-Wide Sequencing for Rare Disease Diagnosis Using Contingent Valuation.

Applied health economics and health policy·2025
Same author

Is time a gift for health and life satisfaction? Exploring the relationship between time allocation and adaptation to a breast cancer diagnosis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025
Same author

Patient Preferences for HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer Adjuvant Treatment: A Multicountry Discrete Choice Experiment.

Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same journal

Health on the Move: The Impact of Poverty Alleviation Relocation on Healthcare Utilization in China.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Compulsory Licensing: A Case Study of HIV Drugs.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Beyond Tobacco Prevention: The Effects of Tobacco 21 Laws on Young Adults' Body Weight.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Assessing the Estimands and Estimates of Hospitalization Rates in Health Economics and Clinical Medicine.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Unemployment Insurance Benefit Cuts on Mental Health: Evidence From Early Pandemic Program Expirations.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Do Patients Value the Service Provided by Physicians Who Overbill? A Willingness-to-Pay Study Using French Survey Data.

Health economics·2026
See all related articles

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) can assess healthcare preferences, even without market data. This study models opt-out choices in DCEs for cervical screening preferences, enhancing preference research.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are valuable for studying healthcare preferences when real-world data is scarce.
  • Hypothetical scenarios in DCEs must accurately reflect real-world decision-making contexts.
  • The 'opt-out' option, where individuals decline all available choices, is a common real-world scenario.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the methodological challenges of modeling "opt-out" choices within discrete choice experiments.
  • To investigate women's preferences for cervical screening services, incorporating the possibility of opting out.
  • To enhance the realism and applicability of DCEs in healthcare preference research.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a discrete choice experiment (DCE) design.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Incorporated an opt-out option to simulate non-demand for services.
  • Focused on modeling women's preferences for cervical screening services.

    • Main Results:

    • The study identifies and discusses key issues in statistically modeling DCE data that includes an opt-out choice.
    • Findings provide insights into how to better represent non-participation or non-demand in healthcare preference studies.
    • The research highlights the importance of accounting for the opt-out option in understanding patient choices.

    Conclusions:

    • Discrete choice experiments can be adapted to include and model opt-out scenarios, improving their utility in healthcare.
    • Accurate modeling of non-demand is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of patient preferences and healthcare service utilization.
    • This approach offers a more robust method for eliciting preferences in public health interventions like cervical screening.