Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026
13:34
Predicting In Vivo Payloads Delivery using a Blood-brain Tumor-barrier in a Dish
Published on: April 16, 2019
In vivo validation of the bystander effect
1Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. amin_kassis@hms.harvard.edu
Human & Experimental Toxicology
|April 9, 2004
Summary
Radiation exposure can harm cells not directly hit. This study shows targeted cancer cell irradiation in vivo causes bystander effects, impacting risk assessment and radionuclide therapy evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Radiobiology
- Oncology
- Radiation Physics
Background:
- The bystander effect describes cellular responses to radiation not directly impacting them.
- Previous research focused on in vitro bystander effects.
- The in vivo bystander effect in tumors remained less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the in vivo bystander effect following targeted radionuclide irradiation of human tumor cells.
- To determine the implications of in vivo bystander effects for radiation risk assessment.
- To re-evaluate the therapeutic potential of internally administered radionuclides.
Main Methods:
- In vivo irradiation of human tumor cells in a subcutaneous tumor model.
- Observation and analysis of biologic responses in non-targeted cells within the tumor.
- Comparison of findings with existing models for radiation risk and therapy assessment.
Main Results:
- Specific irradiation of human tumor cells in vivo induced a significant bystander effect within the tumor.
- Non-targeted cells exhibited biologic responses, indicating a systemic effect.
- The observed in vivo bystander effect challenges current risk estimation models.
Conclusions:
- In vivo bystander effects following radionuclide decay are a critical factor in radiation biology.
- Current risk assessment protocols for internal radioactivity exposure and nuclear medicine procedures require re-evaluation.
- The therapeutic efficacy of radionuclide-based treatments may be influenced by bystander responses.
Related Concept Videos
02:30Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
02:20Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
00:52Social Proof
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
02:09Bystander Effect
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
01:04Social Facilitation
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
00:57Deindividuation
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.