Related Experiment Videos
Reported adverse drug reactions and their determinants in Dutch children outside the hospital
Eric Schirm1, Hilde Tobi, Eugène P van Puijenbroek
1Groningen University Institute for Drug Exploration, University of Groningen, Department of Social Pharmacy, Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Insights
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in children were disproportionately reported for systemic, new, anti-infective, and nervous system drugs. Drug use patterns alone do not explain these ADRs in the pediatric population.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric pharmacology
- Drug safety surveillance
- Pharmacovigilance
Background:
- Studies on pediatric adverse drug reactions (ADRs) outside hospitals lack control groups, hindering interpretation.
- Understanding drug use patterns is crucial for analyzing ADRs in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe ADRs in children outside the hospital.
- To control for drug use in the general pediatric population using a case-control design.
Main Methods:
- A case-control study compared drugs reported for suspected ADRs to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre LAREB with drugs used in the general pediatric population.
- Data from the InterAction pharmacy database for children aged 0-16 years in 2001 were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Systemic, new, anti-infective, and nervous system drugs were disproportionately reported for ADRs.
- Unlicensed, frequently used, and dermatological drugs were less associated with reported ADRs.
- Off-label prescription proportions did not differ between ADR-suspected drugs and general pediatric drug use.
Conclusions:
- The observed patterns of drugs associated with pediatric ADRs cannot be solely attributed to general drug utilization patterns.
- Further research is needed to understand the specific factors contributing to ADRs in children.
Purpose:
The interpretation of the available studies on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in children outside the hospital is hampered because none of these studies used a control group. The aim of this study was to describe ADRs in children outside the hospital, controlled for drug use in the paediatric background population.
Methods:
Using a case-control design, we compared drugs on which a suspected ADR was reported to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre LAREB, and drugs used in the general paediatric population from the InterAction pharmacy database, both in the year 2001, for children aged 0-16 years.
Results:
The main findings are that ADRs were disproportionately more often reported on systemic drugs (OR 3.0; [95%CI: 1.9-4.8]), new drugs (2.4; [1.6-2.7]), anti-infective drugs (1.7; [1.1-2.7]) and nervous system drugs (2.1; [1.3-3.5]), whereas unlicensed drugs (0.1; [0.0-0.4]), frequently used drugs (0.3; [0.2-0.5]) and dermatologicals (0.1; [0.0-0.4]) were less likely to be associated with a reported ADR. Overall, the proportion of off-label prescriptions did not differ between drugs suspected of an ADR and drugs used by children in a general population.
Conclusions:
The pattern of drugs associated with a reported ADR could not be solely explained on the basis of drug utilisation patterns in the general population.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution