Comparing the use of short-acting and long-acting calcium channel blockers in an HMO
R E Johnson1, D J Harrowe, B H McFarland
1Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Division, 3800 N. Kaiser Center Drive, Portland, OR 97227-1098, USA.
Insights
This study suggests short-acting calcium channel blockers (CCBs) may have lower risks than long-acting forms, but selection bias makes definitive conclusions difficult. Randomized trials are needed for clarity on CCB safety.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Controversy exists regarding myocardial infarction (MI) risks associated with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive patients.
- The specific dosage form (short-acting vs. long-acting) is a key factor in this risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and healthcare utilization between short-acting and long-acting CCB users.
- To investigate potential differences in MI risk based on CCB dosage form.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of HMO members using CCBs between 1990-1994.
- Comparison of incident CCB users based on dosage form and prior/concurrent medication use and service utilization.
- Identified incident users as those with no prior cardiovascular drug use.
Main Results:
- Short-acting CCB users significantly outnumbered long-acting CCB users (8:1 ratio).
- Few incident users of long-acting CCBs were identified, limiting direct comparison.
- While diagnoses and comorbidities were similar, short-acting users showed trends towards less exposure to certain medications and services.
Conclusions:
- Substantial selection bias complicates retrospective comparisons of short-acting and long-acting CCBs.
- Differences in user characteristics and potential biases make definitive conclusions about relative safety difficult.
- Randomized clinical trials are essential to determine the true safety and effectiveness of different CCB dosage forms.
Abstract:
One of the questions surrounding the controversy over the risks of MI among hypertensives taking calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is the dosage form, and whether the short-acting form may be more likely than the long-acting to increase the risk of MI. This preliminary study compared HMO members receiving the two dosage forms by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and by utilization (hospital, office visits, emergency room, outside of HMO services) prior to and during CCB use. The sampling frame was members with one or more dispensings for a CCB 1990 through 1994. Incident users were those who received one or more CCB dispensings and no cardiovascular disease-related drugs the year prior to their first dispensing of a CCB. CCB users were those who had at least 90 days of continuous CCB use. Short-acting outnumbered long-acting users by eight to one. Few incident users of long-acting CCBs were found. Among incident users, diagnoses and comorbidities were similar. In general, short-acting users appeared to have less risk of exposure to heart-related medications, but similar risks of exposure to non-heart-related drugs and to utilization of the various services during the year prior to first use. The odds of being exposed to heart-related medications and non-heart related medications and use of services during periods of use of CCBs were similar in general, but where differences were observed, the odds of being exposed were less among short-acting users. Users of the two dosage forms in this setting prior to reports questioning the safety of short-acting CCBs were different quantitatively and qualitatively making a retrospective comparative study difficult, perhaps not possible, due to substantial selection bias among users. Further patient selection bias has also undoubtedly occurred subsequent to the reports. The final answer to the relative safety and effectiveness of the different dosage forms of calcium channel blockers is likely to have come from randomized clinical trials.
More Related Videos
07:42Contractions of Human-iPSC-derived Cardiomyocyte Syncytia Measured with a Ca-sensitive Fluorescent Dye in Temperature-controlled 384-well Plates
Published on: October 18, 2018
10:01High-Throughput Optical Controlling and Recording Calcium Signal in iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Toxicity Testing and Phenotypic Drug Screening
Published on: March 31, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of Calcium Channel Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
