Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning effects associated with repeated word-recognition measures using sentence materials.

Richard H Wilson1, Theodore S Bell, John A Koslowski

  • 1James H. Quillen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN 37684, USA. richard.wilson2@med.va.gov

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
|April 13, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MAPK-driven epithelial cell plasticity drives colorectal cancer therapeutic resistance.

Nature·2025
Same author

Accuracy of glomerular filtration rate estimates among patients with cancer.

British journal of cancer·2025
Same author

A Preliminary Report on an Adaptive Word-Recognition Protocol That Generates Word-Recognition Functions.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2025
Same author

Predicted and measured word-recognition scores unmask distortion in the impaired auditory system.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

A Phase Ia/b study of MEK1/2 inhibitor binimetinib with MET inhibitor crizotinib in patients with RAS mutant advanced colorectal cancer (MErCuRIC).

BMC cancer·2025
Same author

A phase Ia study of the MEK1/2 inhibitor PD-0325901 with the c-MET inhibitor crizotinib in patients with advanced solid cancers.

BJC reports·2025
Same journal

Presentation Highlights: International service delivery.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2023
Same journal

Iraq/Afghanistan-era Veterans with back pain: Characteristics and predictors of compensation and pension award.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2021
Same journal

Prosthetic fitting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: A prospective study.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2020
Same journal

Tongue-controlled robotic rehabilitation: A feasibility study in people with stroke.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2017
Same journal

Utility of a multimodal neurophysiologic assessment tool in distinguishing between individuals with and without a history of mild traumatic brain injury.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2017
Same journal

Efficacy of extremely low-frequency magnetic field in fibromyalgia pain: A pilot study.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2017
See all related articles

Repeated listening tests improved hearing thresholds, but not due to learning specific words. This suggests participants adapted to the testing procedure itself over time.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding learning effects in auditory perception is crucial for accurate hearing assessments.
  • Adaptive testing paradigms are commonly used but require careful consideration of potential learning biases.
  • Age-related differences in auditory processing necessitate research across diverse demographic groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of repeated exposure to auditory stimuli on hearing thresholds across different age groups.
  • To differentiate between learning of the test procedure and learning of specific test materials.
  • To assess the influence of an adaptive paradigm on auditory learning over multiple sessions.

Main Methods:

  • Employed an adaptive paradigm with sentence materials containing target words for three age groups (<30, 40-60, >65 years) over five sessions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Administered control lists across all sessions and experimental lists in sessions 1 and 5, with experimental lists removed in between.
  • Collected threshold data to analyze learning effects related to the procedure versus specific word recognition.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences in mean thresholds were observed across the three age groups.
    • No significant difference was found between experimental and control conditions, indicating no specific word learning.
    • Thresholds in Session 5 were significantly lower than in Session 1, suggesting procedural learning.

    Conclusions:

    • Improved hearing thresholds resulted from adaptation to the testing procedure, not from memorization of test words or sentences.
    • Familiarity with the listening-response task, speaker, and environment contributes to threshold improvements.
    • The findings highlight the importance of accounting for procedural learning in auditory assessment protocols.