Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods to measure sensory function in humans versus animals.

Alberto Martinez-Arizala1

  • 1Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Center of Excellence in Functional Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury, VA Medical Center, Miami, FL 33125, USA. amartinez@miami.edu

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
|April 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Current methods for assessing sensation in spinal cord injury (SCI) lack quantification. Developing more sophisticated, quantitative sensory tests is crucial for both clinical and research settings in SCI recovery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a pain education resource for people with spinal cord injury.

Frontiers in public health·2023
Same author

Barriers and Facilitators to Optimal Neuropathic Pain Management: SCI Consumer, Significant Other, and Health Care Provider Perspectives.

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)·2020
Same author

Subgroup Perspectives on Chronic Pain and Its Management After Spinal Cord Injury.

The journal of pain·2018
Same author

Deep Brain Stimulation Improves the Symptoms and Sensory Signs of Persistent Central Neuropathic Pain from Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2017
Same author

Living With Chronic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2016
Same author

The midbrain central gray best suppresses chronic pain with electrical stimulation at very low pulse rates in two human cases.

Brain research·2015

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Sensation is a complex sense vital for environmental interaction and motor control.
  • Current clinical assessment of sensation in spinal cord injury (SCI) uses outdated, non-quantitative methods like the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score.
  • Existing animal models for SCI research lack sophisticated, quantitative sensory testing methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of current sensory testing in SCI.
  • To emphasize the need for developing advanced, quantitative sensory assessment tools.
  • To bridge the gap between clinical and experimental approaches for measuring sensory function recovery in SCI.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing sensory testing methodologies in human SCI and animal models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the shortcomings of traditional clinical sensory assessment tools.
  • Identification of potential areas for improvement in experimental sensory evaluation.

    • Main Results:

    • Traditional sensory testing, including the ASIA score, is not quantitative and lacks sophistication.
    • Current experimental animal models of SCI do not fully utilize advanced sensory and pain perception testing methods.
    • A significant need exists for refined, quantifiable tests to measure sensory recovery in SCI.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a critical need for the development of more sophisticated and quantitative sensory tests for SCI.
    • Improved assessment tools are required for both clinical practice and experimental research in SCI.
    • Advancing sensory testing will enhance the understanding and measurement of functional recovery after SCI.