Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Brain networks underlying human timing behavior are influenced by prior context.

Kelly J Jantzen1, Fred L Steinberg, J A Scott Kelso

  • 1Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. jantzen@ccs.fau.edu

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|April 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Neural timing mechanisms are flexible. The brain recruits different areas for motor timing based on whether movements are synchronized or syncopated with a metronome, showing context-dependent neural activity.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Universal and Cross-Cultural Variations in Audio-Motor Synchronization Between French and Indian Participants.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same author

On Intention and Fluctuations in the Coordination Dynamics of Animate Movement.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Pathfinding: a neurodynamical account of intuition.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Metastability demystified - the foundational past, the pragmatic present and the promising future.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Minds and markets as complex systems: an emerging approach to cognitive economics.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2024
Same author

Artificial intelligence detects awareness of functional relation with the environment in 3 month old babies.

Scientific reports·2024

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The continuation paradigm is a common method to study internal timing mechanisms.
  • Neural activity during timing tasks is often assumed to be independent of the initial pacing context.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how neural activity for time representation is influenced by the initial pacing context (in-phase vs. anti-phase).
  • To compare brain activation during synchronized and syncopated pacing and continuation phases.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to measure brain activity in 14 subjects.
  • Participants performed four conditions: synchronized pacing, synchronized continuation, syncopated pacing, and syncopated continuation with an auditory metronome.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Movement timing remained consistent across all conditions.
  • Syncopation (anti-phase pacing) engaged a broader neural network, including the supplementary motor area, premotor cortex, thalamus, inferior frontal gyrus, and cerebellum, compared to synchronization.
  • No significant differences in brain activity were found between pacing and continuation phases, except for reduced auditory cortex activity during continuation due to the absence of the metronome.

Conclusions:

  • The neural networks supporting motor timing are context-dependent, varying with the method used to establish the temporal reference.
  • These findings highlight the flexibility of neural mechanisms for time and timing, demonstrating their adaptability to different contextual demands.