Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Facing requests for euthanasia: a clinical practice guideline.

C Gastmans1, F Van Neste, P Schotsmans

  • 1Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium. University of Antwerp, Belgium. chris.gastmans@med.kuleuven.ac.be

Journal of Medical Ethics
|April 15, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How to achieve the desired outcomes of advance care planning in nursing homes: a theory of change.

BMC geriatrics·2018
Same author

How couples' experiences prior to the start of infertility treatment with donor gametes influence the disclosure decision.

Gynecologic and obstetric investigation·2013
Same author

Factors contributing to parental decision-making in disclosing donor conception: a systematic review.

Human reproduction update·2013
Same author

Nurses' decision-making process in cases of physical restraint in acute elderly care: a qualitative study.

International journal of nursing studies·2012
Same author

Telesurgery: an ethical appraisal.

Journal of medical ethics·2008
Same author

Nurses' attitudes towards artificial food or fluid administration in patients with dementia and in terminally ill patients: a review of the literature.

Journal of medical ethics·2008
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Not all personal utilities are equal: a two-tier normative framework for genomic health technology assessment.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Emergent ethics of xenotransplantation: findings from a survey on public attitudes toward animal to human organ transplantation in the UK.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Is sport in the 'public interest'? Towards a legal and ethical framework for justifying sport-related harm.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Belgium legalized euthanasia in 2002, but how this law impacts patient care remains unclear. Further research is needed to understand the practical application of euthanasia regulations in clinical settings.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Bioethics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Belgium enacted its Euthanasia Act on September 23, 2002, becoming the second nation globally to legally permit euthanasia.
  • Despite legal frameworks, the practical implementation of euthanasia laws within patient care settings is not well-documented.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the translation of Belgium's legal euthanasia regulation into actual patient care practices.
  • To identify knowledge gaps concerning the application of euthanasia law in clinical contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of legal documents and policy statements.
  • Review of existing literature on euthanasia implementation in Belgium.
  • Exploratory research into healthcare provider perspectives (details not specified in abstract).
Keywords:
Death and EuthanasiaLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The legal framework for euthanasia in Belgium is established.
  • There is a significant lack of empirical data on how the law is applied in practice.
  • Understanding the gap between legal provisions and clinical reality is crucial.

Conclusions:

  • The study highlights a critical need for research into the practical aspects of euthanasia care in Belgium.
  • Further investigation is required to bridge the gap between legal policy and patient care delivery.
  • This research is essential for ensuring effective and ethical implementation of euthanasia laws.