Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do studies of interventions to improve laypeople's critical thinking about health choices assess potential harms? A systematic review.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Informed decisions about public health and social measures.

Health research policy and systems·2025
Same author

Promoting informed health choices: the long and winding road.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2025
Same author

Participants' experiences of potential adverse effects of an intervention to improve critical thinking about health choices: a qualitative cross-trial process evaluation in Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the Informed Health Choices-Cancer programme: A pilot randomised trial protocol.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Developing critical thinking and decision-making skills for cancer information: the Informed Health Choice-Cancer online learning resource.

Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice·2025
Same journal

Identification of spastic muscles involved in abnormal joint posture in patients with upper motor neuron syndrome: a narrative review.

Journal of rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same journal

Exertional compartment syndrome and median nerve compression caused by a reversed palmaris longus.

Journal of rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same journal

NASA lean test detects postural orthostatic tachycardia in chronic post-COVID.

Journal of rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same journal

Preoperative physiotherapy and one-year patient-reported outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty: a registry-based cohort study of 1,688 patients.

Journal of rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same journal

Healthcare utilization in patients with spina bifida and bone fractures.

Journal of rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same journal

Early rehabilitation in trauma patients: an observational study from two Norwegian trauma centers.

Journal of rehabilitation medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

You cannot make informed choices without information.

Andrew D Oxman1

  • 1Department of Health Services Research, Norwegian Directorate for Health and Social Welfare, Oslo, Norway. oxman@online.no

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
|April 16, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic reviews offer essential data for managing mild brain injury. Critically applying this information and implementing context-specific recommendations are crucial for better patient outcomes.

More Related Videos

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
09:23

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans

Published on: August 16, 2017

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
09:23

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans

Published on: August 16, 2017

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Evidence-based Medicine
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Effective management of mild brain injury relies on accessible, valid, and relevant information.
  • Systematic reviews provide crucial data but are insufficient alone for clinical recommendations.
  • Task Force initiatives aim to improve decision-making in mild traumatic brain injury management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of systematic reviews in informing clinical decisions.
  • To emphasize the need for critical application and context-specific implementation of evidence.
  • To underscore the role of structured guidelines in managing mild brain injury.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the role of systematic reviews in evidence-based practice.
  • Review of decision-making processes for mild traumatic brain injury.
  • Examination of implementation strategies for clinical recommendations.

Main Results:

  • Systematic reviews are essential but not sufficient for comprehensive management strategies.
  • Informed decision-making requires critical appraisal and contextual application of review findings.
  • Effective implementation of evidence-based recommendations is key to improving outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Translating systematic review findings into practice requires critical evaluation and tailored recommendations.
  • Successful management of mild brain injury necessitates integrating evidence with clinical judgment and specific patient contexts.
  • Collaborative efforts, like those of the Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, enhance the utility of systematic reviews for improved patient care.