Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Death certification in Auckland.

A Still1, T D Koelmeyer, J C Vuletic

  • 1Department of Forensic Pathology, University of Auckland School of Medicine.

The New Zealand Medical Journal
|August 26, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When Technical Rationality Fails: Thinking about Terminally Ill Patients.

Journal of health psychology·2011
Same author

Psychotherapy and the historical imagination.

History of the human sciences·2008
Same author

Ritalin: drug of abuse. Two case reports of intra-arterial injection.

The New Zealand medical journal·2002
Same author

The forensic pathology of nonagenarians and centenarians: do they die of old age? (The Auckland experience).

The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology·2001
Same author

Test and teach. Ill-defined subendocardial nodules in an infant. Histiocytoid cardiomyopathy.

Pathology·2001
Same author

Phaeochromocytomas discovered during coronial autopsies in Sydney, Melbourne and Auckland.

Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine·2001
Same journal

Reed diffusers: a potential cause of poisoning in young children in New Zealand.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same journal

Stuffy nights: elevated bedroom carbon dioxide concentrations indicate inadequate ventilation in Wellington homes.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same journal

Cautionary tale of how sodium polystyrene sulfonate caused gut necrosis: a case report.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same journal

Emergency lateral canthotomy and cantholysis for acute globe subluxation.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same journal

Liberation of an incarcerated tibialis posterior tendon following a posterior malleolar ankle fracture: a case report.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same journal

Implementing a cultural safety training plan across medical colleges in Aotearoa New Zealand-looking back, and looking forward.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
See all related articles

Many general practitioners misunderstand death certification laws, leading to unnecessary coroner referrals. A key issue is not recognizing that a doctor must have seen the patient during their final illness to sign the certificate.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Public Health
  • General Practice

Background:

  • General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in certifying deaths.
  • Referral of natural deaths to the coroner can be influenced by GP understanding of legislation and circumstances of death.
  • Accurate death certification is vital for public health statistics and legal purposes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reasons why general practitioners refer cases of natural death to the coroner.
  • To assess general practitioners' understanding of the relevant legislation for death certification.

Main Methods:

  • A seven-month study involving telephone interviews with the deceased's general practitioner for cases referred to the coroner.
  • GPs were questioned about their knowledge of the death and willingness to sign a cause of death certificate.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Cases were categorized based on whether the GP could have legally signed the certificate.

    • Main Results:

    • Out of 314 contactable GPs, 257 would not have signed the certificate (183 due to unexpected death, 74 not seeing the patient recently enough).
    • In 57 cases, GPs could have signed but did not (23 unaware of death, 13 uncontactable, 14 certificate rejected, 7 miscellaneous reasons).
    • A significant lack of understanding regarding the 'last illness' requirement for certification was observed.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a concerning lack of understanding among general practitioners regarding death certification legislation, particularly the 'last illness' rule.
    • GPs need clearer guidance on the criteria for signing death certificates to reduce inappropriate coroner referrals.
    • Emphasis should be placed on the concept of 'last illness' rather than arbitrary timeframes when certifying a death.