Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Real-Time cAMP Dynamics in Live Cells Using the Fluorescent cAMP Difference Detector In Situ
Published on: March 22, 2024
High throughput screening technologies for direct cyclic AMP measurement
Daniela Gabriel1, Magali Vernier, Martin J Pfeifer
1Novartis Pharma AG, Lead Discovery Center, Basel, Switzerland. daniela.gabriel@pharma.novartis.com
Abstract:
A study comparing five different cAMP detection technologies in terms of sensitivity, robustness, and feasibility for HTS is presented. In this report, the following methods are described: a nonhomogeneous DELFIA, and the homogeneous methods based on time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF), luminescent singlet oxygen channeling or ALPHAScreen, FP, and high-affinity enzyme complementation. DELFIA had the highest sensitivity, whereas ALPHAScreen and HTRF shared several advantages, including high sensitivity, broad dynamic range, and minimal reagent addition steps. For G(s)-coupled antagonist screens, we found HTRF and ALPHAScreen the more sensitive and HTS-compatible techniques.
More Related Videos
09:39Drug-induced Sensitization of Adenylyl Cyclase: Assay Streamlining and Miniaturization for Small Molecule and siRNA Screening Applications
Published on: January 27, 2014
08:46A "Dual-Addition" Calcium Fluorescence Assay for the High-Throughput Screening of Recombinant G Protein-Coupled Receptors
Published on: December 2, 2022