Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026
Sublingual Immunotherapy as an Alternative to Induce Protection Against Acute Respiratory Infections
Published on: August 30, 2014
Sublingual immunotherapy: an update
Giovanni Passalacqua1, Carlo Lombardi, Giorgio Walter Canonica
1Allergy & Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. passalacqua@unige.it
Purpose Of Review:
Sublingual immunotherapy is now officially accepted as a viable alternative to the traditional subcutaneous route, and it is widely used especially in European countries. Despite the large amount of experimental evidence on the safety and efficacy of the method, some concerns still exist, and several aspects need to be clarified: magnitude of the efficacy, adherence, long-lasting effect and others. Recently published studies have provided answers to some of these points.
Recent Findings:
The most recent studies have shown that sublingual immunotherapy exerts a long-lasting effect up to 5 years after discontinuation and that it is able to prevent the onset of new sensitizations. Moreover, when systematically assessed, the adherence to treatment is quite satisfactory, despite the treatment being self-administered. In addition, evidence has been provided that sublingual immunotherapy is effective in treating allergic conjunctivitis, and a metaanalysis has confirmed its efficacy in rhinitis. Moreover, some studies have addressed the possibility of simplifying the schedule of administration by shortening the build-up phase.
Summary:
More and more new data on sublingual immunotherapy are rapidly appearing in the international literature. These data confirm the clinical value of this treatment and show that it is comparable to subcutaneous immunotherapy from several points of view.
