Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).
06:04

Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).

Published on: March 6, 2018

A rational approach to benign prostatic hyperplasia evaluation: recent advances.

Saurabh Bhargava1, A Erdem Canda, Christopher R Chapple

  • 1Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.

Current Opinion in Urology
|April 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary

This study reviews recent advances in diagnosing benign prostatic hyperplasia. It highlights how symptom scores, prostate volume, and prostate-specific antigen levels help predict disease progression. Traditional methods like digital rectal exams remain important. Newer techniques like ultrasound and non-invasive urodynamic studies show promise but need more validation. The authors suggest a minimal diagnostic protocol that includes history, exams, and PSA testing. Advanced tests should be reserved for complex cases. The goal is to develop a reliable framework for early diagnosis and treatment planning.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A spine full of surprises: spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma presenting with acute non-traumatic paraparesis.

International journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Are There Potential New Therapeutic Avenues for Treating Idiopathic Nocturia? ICI-RS 2025.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2025
Same author

A critical comparison of polypropylene and polyurethane sling materials after implantation in a suburethral sheep model.

Biomaterials·2025
Same author

What Is Required for AI to Improve the Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction? ICI-RS 2025.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2025
Same author

From Clinical Trials to Routine Practice: Are Urodynamics Still Useful?

European urology·2025
Same author

Do We Need to Re-Focus on Functional Female Urethral Disorders in Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction? ICI-RS 2024.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2024

Area of Science:

  • Urology clinical diagnostics
  • Prostate disease progression modeling
  • Lower urinary tract symptom evaluation

Background:

Current diagnostic approaches for lower urinary tract symptoms lack precision in predicting disease progression. Prior research has shown that symptom scores and prostate volume correlate with disease outcomes. However, no prior work had resolved how to integrate newer diagnostic tools with traditional assessments. This gap motivated the need for updated diagnostic frameworks. Established knowledge includes the role of prostate-specific antigen as a biomarker. Yet, uncertainty remains about how best to combine clinical exams with evolving technologies. Recent studies suggest that non-invasive methods may improve diagnostic accuracy. That uncertainty drove the need for a comprehensive review of diagnostic strategies.

Purpose Of The Study:

This paper aims to clarify the evolving diagnostic landscape for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The specific problem is the lack of consensus on which tests best predict disease progression. Researchers propose that integrating clinical exams with newer imaging techniques could improve outcomes. The motivation stems from the high variability in diagnostic approaches across clinics. Traditional methods alone may miss subtle disease markers. The goal is to establish a diagnostic hierarchy that prioritizes accuracy and efficiency. This approach may help identify patients at higher risk of progression. The study focuses on how to optimize diagnostic workflows for better patient outcomes.

Keywords:
prostate disease progressionurodynamic testingclinical diagnostic protocolslower urinary tract symptoms

Frequently Asked Questions

Symptom scores, prostate volume, and prostate-specific antigen levels closely relate to disease progression.

Pressure flow studies help exclude patients unlikely to benefit from prostatic surgery by assessing detrusor function.

Digital rectal exams are vital for assessing prostate size and texture as part of baseline evaluation.

Non-invasive urodynamic techniques appear promising but require further evaluation for diagnostic reliability.

More Related Videos

Ultrasonography of the Adult Male Urinary Tract for Urinary Functional Testing
05:25

Ultrasonography of the Adult Male Urinary Tract for Urinary Functional Testing

Published on: August 14, 2019

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
05:19

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance

Published on: November 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).
06:04

Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).

Published on: March 6, 2018

Ultrasonography of the Adult Male Urinary Tract for Urinary Functional Testing
05:25

Ultrasonography of the Adult Male Urinary Tract for Urinary Functional Testing

Published on: August 14, 2019

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
05:19

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance

Published on: November 7, 2025

Main Methods:

The authors conducted a systematic review of clinical evaluation techniques. They analyzed both non-invasive and invasive diagnostic approaches. Digital rectal exams and symptom scoring were evaluated as baseline tools. Pressure flow studies were assessed for their role in surgical decision-making. Newer ultrasound methods were examined for their potential in disease monitoring. Prostate-specific antigen measurements were reviewed for their predictive value. The study compared traditional diagnostic protocols with emerging technologies. Researchers emphasized the need for further validation of non-invasive urodynamic techniques.

Main Results:

Symptom scores, prostate volume, and prostate-specific antigen levels were found to correlate. These markers suggest potential for predicting disease progression. Conventional pressure flow studies remain useful for surgical exclusion criteria. Digital rectal exams and symptom scoring form the diagnostic foundation. Newer ultrasound techniques show promise but require more validation. Non-invasive urodynamic methods appear promising but need further study. The minimal diagnostic protocol includes history, exams, and PSA measurement. Researchers propose reserving advanced tests for complex cases.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that integrating clinical exams with newer diagnostic tools improves accuracy. They propose that symptom scores and prostate-specific antigen remain essential markers. Digital rectal exams should remain part of the standard evaluation. Conventional pressure flow studies help identify poor surgical candidates. Non-invasive urodynamic methods may enhance diagnostic capabilities. Researchers suggest that newer ultrasound techniques warrant further investigation. The minimal diagnostic protocol should include history, exams, and PSA measurement. These findings suggest a need for standardized diagnostic approaches.

Prostate-specific antigen measurement is part of the minimal diagnostic protocol to assess disease progression risk.

Researchers suggest reserving advanced diagnostic methods for more complex clinical scenarios.