Related Experiment Videos
Selecting ozone exposure statistics for determining crop yield loss from air pollutants
R C Musselman1, P M McCool, T Younglove
1Statewide Air Pollution Research Center, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
|January 1, 1988
Summary
Ozone exposure statistics significantly impact crop yield, but no single measure is universally best. Different crops respond to varying ozone thresholds, highlighting the need for species-specific assessments.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Environmental Science
- Atmospheric Chemistry
Background:
- Ambient ozone is a significant abiotic stressor affecting crop productivity.
- Previous studies have utilized various ozone exposure metrics to assess crop damage.
- Understanding the relationship between ozone exposure and crop yield is crucial for agricultural management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of numerous ozone exposure statistics in predicting crop yield loss.
- To identify the most suitable ozone metrics for different crop species.
- To inform agricultural practices regarding ozone pollution impacts.
Main Methods:
- Calculated 163 ozone exposure statistics from hourly ozone data in a California ambient ozone gradient.
- Utilized polynomial regression to correlate ozone statistics with crop yield for alfalfa, tomatoes, cotton, and dry beans.
- Assessed statistic performance using residual mean square (RMS) values.
Main Results:
- No single ozone statistic was optimal for all tested crop species.
- Ozone statistics incorporating threshold levels generally performed well, with optimal thresholds varying by crop.
- Daily hours of exposure above a high-concentration threshold correlated well with yield for alfalfa, market tomatoes, and dry beans.
- The average of daily peak ozone concentrations best predicted cotton yield.
Conclusions:
- The selection of ozone exposure statistics for crop yield assessment should be crop-specific.
- Ozone statistics with threshold levels are valuable, but the optimal threshold is species-dependent.
- When statistical performance is similar, biologically relevant ozone metrics should be prioritized.