Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validation of alternative methods for developmental toxicity testing.

Aldert H Piersma1

  • 1Department of Reproductive Toxicology, Laboratory for Toxicology, Pathology and Genetics, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment RIVM, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. ah.piersma@rivm.nl

Toxicology Letters
|April 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exposure matters: The impact of exposure characteristics on In Vitro neurotoxicity of pesticides and implications for regulatory testing.

Toxicology·2026
Same author

A pipeline for developing AI-driven models to predict molecular initiating events: a case study on neural tube defects.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Hypothesis-driven approach to developmental toxicity assessment: Using mechanistic information to inform testing" [Reprod. Toxicol. 140 (2026) 109119].

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Hypothesis-driven approach to developmental toxicity assessment: Using mechanistic information to inform testing.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Mechanisms of developmental neurotoxicity mediated by perturbed thyroid hormone homeostasis in the brain: an adverse outcome pathway network.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2025
Same author

A computational dynamic systems model for <i>in silico</i> prediction of neural tube closure defects.

Current research in toxicology·2025
Same journal

LEF1 regulated CTHRC1 Promotes Silica-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis through CD44-Dependent Signaling.

Toxicology letters·2026
Same journal

hERG Channel Blockade and Additive Interactions of Magnolol and Honokiol from Magnolia Species.

Toxicology letters·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of dose-dependent hematotoxic effects of celastrol on human blood cells in vitro.

Toxicology letters·2026
Same journal

Environmental pharmaceutical and antibiotic mixtures: An exposomics-guided framework for mechanistic toxicology.

Toxicology letters·2026
Same journal

Size- and morphology-dependent cytotoxicity of metal-organic frameworks: Deciphering the structure-toxicity relationship.

Toxicology letters·2026
Same journal

Steroidogenesis suppression in H295R cells by 1,3-disubstituted ureas: A potential off-target effect of some sEH inhibitors.

Toxicology letters·2026
See all related articles

Alternative methods for developmental toxicity testing, like the embryonic stem cell test (EST), show promising reproducibility. These in vitro assays offer potential alternatives to traditional animal testing for chemical safety assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Developmental Biology
  • In Vitro Assays

Background:

  • Current developmental toxicity testing relies on animal models (rats, rabbits), exposing pregnant animals and assessing fetal effects.
  • Alternative methods, developed since the 1980s, include cell differentiation assays and organ anlagen development in vitro.
  • More complex methods involve in vitro culture of postimplantation rodent embryos during organogenesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the application of in vitro embryotoxicity assays as toxicity screens.
  • To evaluate the reproducibility and success of established validation studies for developmental toxicity testing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized three established in vitro embryotoxicity assays: embryonic stem cell test (EST), limb bud micromass (MM), and whole embryo culture (WEC).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducted a validation study involving 20 chemical compounds tested across four independent laboratories.
  • Assessed the reproducibility of results obtained from these different in vitro methods.

    • Main Results:

    • The validation study demonstrated marked success in the reproducibility of results across the tested in vitro assays.
    • The embryonic stem cell test (EST), limb bud micromass (MM), and whole embryo culture (WEC) showed consistent outcomes.
    • Results indicated a high degree of reliability for these specific assays in detecting developmental toxicity.

    Conclusions:

    • In vitro embryotoxicity assays, including EST, MM, and WEC, exhibit significant reproducibility.
    • These methods present viable alternatives to traditional animal testing for developmental toxicity screening.
    • Further discussion is needed to generalize these findings to the broader chemical landscape.